Changes

#attempting to control the definitions of words through [[political correctness]].  For example, referring to [[Israel]] as "occupied territories" or suggesting that Al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq are not part of Al-Qaeda.

#attempting to control the definitions of words through [[political correctness]].  For example, referring to [[Israel]] as "occupied territories" or suggesting that Al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq are not part of Al-Qaeda.

#Dismissing legitimate criticism as "a joke" <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Liberal_Style&oldid=266960]</ref>

#Dismissing legitimate criticism as "a joke" <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Liberal_Style&oldid=266960]</ref>

#Denying something widely known to be true but difficult to prove, such as observing that men are far more likely to work in gas stations than women.

#Denying something widely known to be true but difficult to prove, such as observing that men are far more likely to work in gas stations than women.{{fact}}

#Will often deny being a [[liberal]], or will claim to be a "true conservative", while spouting liberal and democratic talking points and criticizing basic conservative beliefs and principles.

#Will often deny being a [[liberal]], or will claim to be a "true conservative", while spouting liberal and democratic talking points and criticizing basic conservative beliefs and principles.

#using non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that [[liberals]] over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]].  But their example does not help their argument.  Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that [[liberals]] do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism).  Think about that.

#using non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that [[liberals]] over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]].  But their example does not help their argument.  Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that [[liberals]] do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism).  Think about that.

#can't understand the difference between identity (e.g., color of one's skin), perspective (e.g., Judeo-[[Christian]]) and bias (e.g., [[Bias in Wikipedia]]).

#can't understand the difference between identity (e.g., color of one's skin), perspective (e.g., Judeo-[[Christian]]) and bias (e.g., [[Bias in Wikipedia]]).

#inability or unwillingness to differentiate between genuine conservative arguments and parodies of conservative arguments.

#inability or unwillingness to differentiate between genuine conservative arguments and parodies of conservative arguments.

#"Contrariness is creativity to the untalented" - Dennis Miller's general observation about liberal behavior.

#"Contrariness is creativity to the untalented" - Dennis Miller's general observation about liberal behavior.{{fact}}

#Assuming criminals are on the other side of the political fence, without evidence.

==References==

==References==