| Line 21: |
Line 21: |
| | The first two [[amendment]]s establish fundamental [[freedom]]s, including the right to keep and bear arms. The third [[amendment]] prohibits placing troops in people’s homes in time of peace. The fourth through eighth [[amendment]]s establish legal rights, particularly for the accused. The ninth [[amendment]] is a vague protection of individual rights, and the tenth [[amendment]] protects [[state]] rights. | | The first two [[amendment]]s establish fundamental [[freedom]]s, including the right to keep and bear arms. The third [[amendment]] prohibits placing troops in people’s homes in time of peace. The fourth through eighth [[amendment]]s establish legal rights, particularly for the accused. The ninth [[amendment]] is a vague protection of individual rights, and the tenth [[amendment]] protects [[state]] rights. |
| | | | |
| − | The [[First Amendment]] receives the most attention. It prohibits [[Congress]] from infringing on free speech, [[press]], assembly, petition and [[religion]]; it also prohibits the establishment of [[religion]]. By implication, it protects [[freedom]] of association. It expressly applies only to [[Congress]], but the [[court]]s have since applied it against all the [[state]]s too. | + | The [[First Amendment]] receives the most attention. It prohibits [[Congress]] from infringing on [[Free Speech Clause|free speech]], [[press]], assembly, petition and [[religion]]; it also prohibits the establishment of [[religion]]. By implication, it protects [[freedom]] of association. It expressly applies only to [[Congress]], but the [[court]]s have since applied it against all the [[state]]s too. |
| | | | |
| | In fact, virtually all of the [[Bill of Rights]] now protect citizens against all forms of [[government]]: federal, state or local. | | In fact, virtually all of the [[Bill of Rights]] now protect citizens against all forms of [[government]]: federal, state or local. |
| Line 27: |
Line 27: |
| | Let’s look at important sections of the [[Bill of Rights]]: | | Let’s look at important sections of the [[Bill of Rights]]: |
| | | | |
| − | ===The Free Speech Clause.=== | + | ===The [[Free Speech Clause]].=== |
| | | | |
| | The [[First Amendment]] protects the greatest of all [constitution]]al rights: “[[Congress]] shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech.” This protects religious and political speech. It protects [[prayer]] in many circumstances; it also protects evangelizing. It was unique to [[America]], reflecting the [[Great Awakening]] and preaching that permeated the [[colony|colonies]] in the 1700s. | | The [[First Amendment]] protects the greatest of all [constitution]]al rights: “[[Congress]] shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech.” This protects religious and political speech. It protects [[prayer]] in many circumstances; it also protects evangelizing. It was unique to [[America]], reflecting the [[Great Awakening]] and preaching that permeated the [[colony|colonies]] in the 1700s. |
| Line 35: |
Line 35: |
| | Now speech includes, for example, the burning of the [[America]]n [[flag]] ([[Texas v. Johnson]]). It includes spending money on political campaigns. It can include vulgar or obscene words. It offers some protection even to commercial speech, such as certain advertisements. | | Now speech includes, for example, the burning of the [[America]]n [[flag]] ([[Texas v. Johnson]]). It includes spending money on political campaigns. It can include vulgar or obscene words. It offers some protection even to commercial speech, such as certain advertisements. |
| | | | |
| − | When something qualifies as “free speech,” the protection against regulation of its content is nearly absolute. Only a compelling interest by the [[government]] can justify infringing on such speech, and the regulation must be narrowly tailored for a necessary goal. | + | When something qualifies as “[[Free Speech Clause|free speech]],” the protection against regulation of its content is nearly absolute. Only a compelling interest by the [[government]] can justify infringing on such speech, and the regulation must be narrowly tailored for a necessary goal. |
| | | | |
| | One might ask, why isn’t all speech protected? Why should the [[government]] be able to abridge any speech? | | One might ask, why isn’t all speech protected? Why should the [[government]] be able to abridge any speech? |
| Line 45: |
Line 45: |
| | Before airplanes and [[terrorism]], the classic example of unprotected speech is yelling “fire” in a crowded theater. People would stampede for the exits, and some could be injured. | | Before airplanes and [[terrorism]], the classic example of unprotected speech is yelling “fire” in a crowded theater. People would stampede for the exits, and some could be injured. |
| | | | |
| − | The [[Supreme Court]] has said that “fighting words” are not “free speech” protected by the [[First Amendment]]. Other types of speech are also excluded from the [[First Amendment]]. But over time, the [[Court]] has redefined protected speech to be broader and broader, including even conduct like flag-burning and political campaign spending. | + | The [[Supreme Court]] has said that “fighting words” are not “[[Free Speech Clause|Free Speech]]” protected by the [[First Amendment]]. Other types of speech are also excluded from the [[First Amendment]]. But over time, the [[Court]] has redefined protected speech to be broader and broader, including even conduct like flag-burning and political campaign spending. |
| | | | |
| | ===B. The Establishment Clause.=== | | ===B. The Establishment Clause.=== |