90
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + + + + + +
Talk:Fox Derangement Syndrome (view source)
Revision as of 23:57, September 28, 2007
, 23:57, September 28, 2007Remove of "been shown by" statement
::Malkin also has used [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/005376.htm Rove Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/005831.htm Condi Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006584.htm?print=1 Laura Bush Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006820.htm?print=1 Iraq Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/007499.htm?print=1 Rush Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006391.htm?print=1 Diebold Derangement Syndrome], and [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/004591.htm?print=1 Cheney Derangement Syndrome]. Are these legit? Should we have articles on them? What would you suggest as a criterion for deciding which of these are important terms that deserve Conservapedia articles? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 22:01, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
::Malkin also has used [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/005376.htm Rove Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/005831.htm Condi Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006584.htm?print=1 Laura Bush Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006820.htm?print=1 Iraq Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/007499.htm?print=1 Rush Derangement Syndrome], [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006391.htm?print=1 Diebold Derangement Syndrome], and [http://michellemalkin.com/archives/004591.htm?print=1 Cheney Derangement Syndrome]. Are these legit? Should we have articles on them? What would you suggest as a criterion for deciding which of these are important terms that deserve Conservapedia articles? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 22:01, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
*Wasn't this article merged before with Goldberg? It should be merged again, in my opinion. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 22:23, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
*Wasn't this article merged before with Goldberg? It should be merged again, in my opinion. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 22:23, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
== Remove of "been shown by" statement ==
I've been asked to justify the removal of the sentence:
:Fox Derangement Syndrome has been said to have been shown by Keith Olbermann, Al Franken, Janeane Garofalo, Chris Matthews, Angelina Jolie, John Edwards, Barack Obama, Howard Dean, Robert Greenwald.
The sentence has sat around for months totally unsourced. I took a look around the Internet for <code>"Fox Derangement Syndrome" "Keith Olbermann"</code> and got nothing. I don't have the time to look around for all of the people, but it's clear that the statement totally shreds Commandments 1 and 2. If there are no protests within the next few hours then I will remove the sentence. - [[User:PostoStudanto|PostoStudanto]] 19:57, 28 September 2007 (EDT)