Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 252:
Line 252: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 19:40, September 29, 2007
, 19:40, September 29, 2007reply
::I'm also confused. Conservative, communist, fascist, libertarian, feminist, etc... all redirect to their philosophies, so how can it be said that this shows bias on Wikipedia's part? Besides, it looks like Wikipedia has actually changed it now and appears to include various definitions of liberal, including the articles <i>Social Liberalism</i> and <i>Modern American Liberalism</i>. [[User:Jelx|Jelx]] 15:30, 29 September 2007 (EDT)
::I'm also confused. Conservative, communist, fascist, libertarian, feminist, etc... all redirect to their philosophies, so how can it be said that this shows bias on Wikipedia's part? Besides, it looks like Wikipedia has actually changed it now and appears to include various definitions of liberal, including the articles <i>Social Liberalism</i> and <i>Modern American Liberalism</i>. [[User:Jelx|Jelx]] 15:30, 29 September 2007 (EDT)
::: The term is "[[liberal]]". [[Wikipedia]] can try all it wants to redefine it, but [[Wikipedia]] is only discrediting itself. And in Wikipedia's silly new terminology, does it admit that [[liberals]] support taxpayer-funded [[abortion]] and censorship of [[prayer]] in the classroom? I doubt it. You can let us know.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:40, 29 September 2007 (EDT)
== "Wikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D." ==
== "Wikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D." ==