Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4 bytes added ,  04:16, September 30, 2007
just some grammar and formatting
Line 1: Line 1: −
The Simulation Argument is a thesis set out in a 2003 paper <ref>Bostrom, N., (2003), Philosophical Quarterly , Vol. 53, No. 211, pp. 243-255. , available from: http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html</ref> by [[Nick Bostrom]], a [[transhumanism| Transhumanist]] philospher, in which he argues that the scenario depicted in the film [[The Matrix]] is correct, and that the world that we see around us is merely a [[computer simulation]].
+
The '''Simulation Argument''' is a thesis set out in a 2003 paper<ref>Bostrom, N., (2003), Philosophical Quarterly , Vol. 53, No. 211, pp. 243-255. , available from: http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html</ref> by [[Nick Bostrom]], a [[transhumanism| Transhumanist]] philosopher, in which he argues that the scenario depicted in the film [[The Matrix]] is correct, and that the world that we see around us is merely a [[computer simulation]].
    
This paper begins by arguing for the logic disjunction between the following three propositions propositions:  
 
This paper begins by arguing for the logic disjunction between the following three propositions propositions:  
# The human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage;  
+
# The human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a "post-human" stage;  
# Any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof);  
+
# Any post-human civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof);  
 
# We are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.  
 
# We are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.  
   −
The paper then goes on to argue that as there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations, therefore it is almost certain that we are living in a computer simulation <ref> see [[Nick Bostrom]]'s website at http://www.simulation-argument.com/</ref> Since 2003 there has been a lot of interest in the idea, especially with the online community.<ref> see, for example the debates and material at: http://www.simulism.org</ref>
+
The paper then goes on to argue that as there is a significant chance that we will one day become post-humans who run ancestor-simulations, therefore it is almost certain that we are living in a computer simulation<ref> see [[Nick Bostrom]]'s website at http://www.simulation-argument.com/</ref> Since 2003 there has been a lot of interest in the idea, especially with the online community.<ref> see, for example the debates and material at: http://www.simulism.org</ref>
    
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
[[category:philosophy]]
 
[[category:philosophy]]
SkipCaptcha, nsSupply_SidersR, nsSupply_Siders_
8,436

edits

Navigation menu