Elaborating the converse, and adding historical notes.
Line 1:
Line 1:
The '''Urysohn lemma''' states:
The '''Urysohn lemma''' states:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
−
If ''A'', ''B'' are 2 disjoint, closed subsets of a [[normal space]] ''X'', then there exist a [[continuous function]] ''f'' : ''X'' → [0, 1], such that ''f(A)'' = 0 and ''f(B)'' = 1.
+
If ''A'', ''B'' are two disjoint, closed subsets of a [[normal space]] ''X'', then there exist a [[continuous function]] ''f'' : ''X'' → [0, 1], such that ''f(A)'' = 0 and ''f(B)'' = 1.
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
−
The converse of the Urysohn lemma also holds.
+
The converse of the Urysohn lemma also holds: if there is such a continuous function for any two disjoint closed sets ''A'' and ''B'' in ''X'', then ''X'' is normal.
+
+
Urysohn died mysteriously in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1924. Some mathematicians have speculated that party officials feared his separation results could be used to undermine the distribution theory underpinning [[Communism]].