20
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 290:
Line 290: + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 03:50, October 1, 2007
, 03:50, October 1, 2007→"No Entry For 'Liberal' "
::::: The [[Wikipedia]] entry you reference is a lie. It conceals how [[liberals]] support taxpayer-funded abortion and censorship of [[prayer]] in [[school]], for example.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:08, 29 September 2007 (EDT)
::::: The [[Wikipedia]] entry you reference is a lie. It conceals how [[liberals]] support taxpayer-funded abortion and censorship of [[prayer]] in [[school]], for example.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:08, 29 September 2007 (EDT)
:::::: Liberals are not united in their beliefs. The Wikipedia article on liberalism mentions that
"liberalism generally opposes government regulation of literature, art, academics, gambling, sex, prostitution, abortion, birth control, terminal illness, alcohol, and cannabis and other controlled substances." How clear can you get? They're not being biased. You may wish that the article included more criticism toward liberals, and no doubt liberals would like the article on "Conservatism" to be more negative, but WIkipedia's internal processes smooth out the edges of personal opinion to keep both articles factual.
I know many liberals and while a portion support "taxpayer-funded abortion" and censorship of prayers, many do not (a small minority of my liberal friends would support prayer censorship of any religion). It is unbiased to report that liberals philosophy "generally supports" something. It would be equally unfair to attempt to attempt to portray conservatives as gun nuts or fascists because most are not. As a libertarian conservative, I would hate to be lumped in with the fringe weirdos within my philosophy.[[User:Archibald|Archibald]] 23:50, 30 September 2007 (EDT)
== "Wikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D." ==
== "Wikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D." ==