Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 297:
Line 297: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 04:22, October 1, 2007
, 04:22, October 1, 2007→"No Entry For 'Liberal' ": reply
:::::::: Read the article. Wikipedia doesn't leave it out. Read the whole article. Wikipedia is not hiding the information that the Democratic party in America generally supports state-funded abortion, but to state that "liberals believe such-and-such" or "Republicans believe such-and-such" is labelling and unfair. Again, I know many liberals (even university professors) who do not support abortion.[[User:Archibald|Archibald]] 00:10, 1 October 2007 (EDT)
:::::::: Read the article. Wikipedia doesn't leave it out. Read the whole article. Wikipedia is not hiding the information that the Democratic party in America generally supports state-funded abortion, but to state that "liberals believe such-and-such" or "Republicans believe such-and-such" is labelling and unfair. Again, I know many liberals (even university professors) who do not support abortion.[[User:Archibald|Archibald]] 00:10, 1 October 2007 (EDT)
:::::::: I read the article, and Wikipedia leaves out both. And I doubt you know any [[liberals]] who don't support censorship of [[prayer]] in [[public school]]. I'm skeptical that you know [[liberals]] who are university professors who oppose legalized [[abortion]]. Post their names and let's see if they've stated that position publicly. I doubt it. Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:22, 1 October 2007 (EDT)
== "Wikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D." ==
== "Wikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D." ==