Siteadmin, Check users, Administrators
12,071
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 313:
Line 313: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 03:42, October 2, 2007
, 03:42, October 2, 2007→Wrap up
#Ergo, evolution is false.
#Ergo, evolution is false.
It's either circular, or you're making one huge assumption. You're aware of this?-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 23:35, 1 October 2007 (EDT)
It's either circular, or you're making one huge assumption. You're aware of this?-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 23:35, 1 October 2007 (EDT)
:Evolution doesn't disprove anything, because no one has proved evolution. No one seems able even to define it. How do ''you'' define it? If someone defines it as change that can happen to a species over time, then evolution says nothing about special origin. But you just implied that evolution ''implies'' that all species derive from one, whose origin remains a mystery. Which is it?
:Also, I repudiate the charge of [[circular reasoning]]. I know about how long the [[earth]] has existed, and it's not the billions of years that would be required.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 23:42, 1 October 2007 (EDT)
== "No Entry For 'Liberal' " ==
== "No Entry For 'Liberal' " ==