5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: + +
→Replacing a sourced claim with an unsourced one?
::But the story was suppressed by the liberal media, it seems. Just like the story of the utter uselessness of the Montreal Protocol has been suppressed. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:01, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
::But the story was suppressed by the liberal media, it seems. Just like the story of the utter uselessness of the Montreal Protocol has been suppressed. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:01, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
:::Ha ha, that's what I figured happened, but I had to make sure :) I'll take a look at the other GW articles; I breifly glanced over them before and if I remember correctly the fundamental science was correct. Never hurts to double check though. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:35, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
*See [[Chernobyl hype]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:03, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
*See [[Chernobyl hype]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:03, 2 October 2007 (EDT)