nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 90:
Line 90: − − == Bias? == − − I read your page about bias on wikipedia. I cannot help but notice the blatant labelling of anything that doesn't agree with your chosen beliefs as 'liberal' and 'bias'. − − I wonder, have you had time to check your own pages for bias? − − When compared with factual data available in the real world, your 'conservapedia' obviously uses its own brand of 'accuracy' for entries. − − The quality of english expression reeks of under-educated home-schooled contributors. Poor grammar is only the start of it. − − Perhaps that's why it seems this 'conservapedia' was set up to enforce a particular world view, not to educate or inform with any accuracy or honesty. − − The bible says to tell the truth, not lie about something until it meets your own preconceived ideas. Lying about things to make them palatable or to 'fit' one's beliefs is... well.... dishonest and BIASED. − − Closing the bias page to comments shows your own BIAS toward only accepting what you want to accept, i.e., only allowing comments that agree with what you believe. It says to me that you are afraid of comments that don't support you, which leads to the thought that you don't entirely trust the veracity of it yourself. − − By the way, I know its very likely you will not only edit, but most likely delete this page as soon as possible before it enlightens anyone and consequently reduces your admiration base. You and I will both know that your reaction is simply a result of your own lack of confidence. At least, you will know this if you can be honest about it. I understand and forgive you your fear. − − Sorry but I will continue to limit my associations to people with ethics.
Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany (view source)
Revision as of 04:49, October 3, 2007
, 04:49, October 3, 2007Reverted edits by Celt (Talk); changed back to last version by Aschlafly
: Thanks Deb! That vandalism was recent, and rare in escaping detection. Thanks to HelpJazz for correcting it. Welcome and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:12, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
: Thanks Deb! That vandalism was recent, and rare in escaping detection. Thanks to HelpJazz for correcting it. Welcome and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:12, 2 October 2007 (EDT)