Changes

Oh, and just noticed, the report actually speaks from 4000 - 9000 casualties, so the 4000 is the best case scenario even in this study. [[User:WillM|WillM]] 06:58, 3 October 2007 (EDT)

Oh, and just noticed, the report actually speaks from 4000 - 9000 casualties, so the 4000 is the best case scenario even in this study. [[User:WillM|WillM]] 06:58, 3 October 2007 (EDT)

Allso worth noting is that there has been other studyes made from the subject afterwards, from which many don't agree with this one. For example [http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19025464.400.html here] is a study that estimates the death toll to be around 30 000 - 60 000 and the new study made by 52 scientists to Greenpeace sets the estimate to even higher[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/18_04_06_chernobyl.pdf]. This controversy is discussed for example in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4923220.stm this] article by BBC. So still today the estimates range from that 4000 - 9000 to all the way up to 100 000. [[User:WillM|WillM]] 07:39, 3 October 2007 (EDT)

Allso worth noting is that there has been other studyes made from the subject afterwards, from which many don't agree with this one. For example [http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19025464.400.html here] is a study that estimates the death toll to be around 30 000 - 60 000 and the new study made by 52 scientists to Greenpeace sets the estimate to even higher[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/18_04_06_chernobyl.pdf]. This controversy is discussed in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4923220.stm this] article by BBC. So still today the estimates range from that 4000 - 9000 to all the way up to 100 000. [[User:WillM|WillM]] 07:39, 3 October 2007 (EDT)