Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 13:15, October 3, 2007

533 bytes added ,  13:15, October 3, 2007
→‎SOME positive aspects of WP?: reply
Line 631: Line 631:     
:While I agree with you that Conservapedia would be taken more seriously by mainstream conservatives if it could allow itself to be a little more balanced, I feel this is unlikely in this currently hyped atmosphere of them and us. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 08:43, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
 
:While I agree with you that Conservapedia would be taken more seriously by mainstream conservatives if it could allow itself to be a little more balanced, I feel this is unlikely in this currently hyped atmosphere of them and us. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 08:43, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: In the lead sentence of its entry about [[Conservapedia]], [[Wikipedia]] lies about our "stated purpose" in an attempt to smear us.  This has been pointed out in [[Bias in Wikipedia]] but the [[liberals]] at [[Wikipedia]] won't correct it.  I doubt you will either.
 +
 +
:: No, there's little of value in a cite as devoted to lies, gossip and pornography as [[Wikipedia]] is.  What's next, you're going to insist that the National Enquirer has much redeeming value?  Please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:15, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,425

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/307150"

Navigation menu