541
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: +
I'm not sure, but keep in mind that there is liberal deceit, but no conservative deceit...
::It's not. Explicitly not, actually, although I think the explicit part was just in the form of talk page comments. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 13:18, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
::It's not. Explicitly not, actually, although I think the explicit part was just in the form of talk page comments. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 13:18, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
But Rob seems to have reverted a user's changes with the commentary "NPOV." Is that [[deceit]]?-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 13:24, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
But Rob seems to have reverted a user's changes with the commentary "NPOV." Is that [[deceit]]?-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 13:24, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
:...that's an excellent question. But God no, it's not deceit. Rob is one of the [[sysop|good guys]], after all. Maybe he meant it as "No NPOV stuff please"? In any case, see things like [[Talk:ACLU#Cartoon]] or [[Talk:Climate cycles]] for just two examples of comments by sysops or blocking-authorized people. Searching for "NPOV" in the Talk namespace gives more results, including the claim that NPOV is still POV and thus inferior to "neutral to the facts" and stuff. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 13:35, 3 October 2007 (EDT)