3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 608:
Line 608: − +
→Rutgers-Ivy "hoax"
: No, you have it backwards. A source is not needed to prove that something never existed. The burden is on the person who makes the claim that something happened to support it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:00, 12 September 2007 (EDT)
: No, you have it backwards. A source is not needed to prove that something never existed. The burden is on the person who makes the claim that something happened to support it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:00, 12 September 2007 (EDT)
::You are absolutely right Ashly, but you had better have a word with Conservative. He has been over on the [Atheism] page asserting that it is for atheists to prove the non-existence of god.--[[User:Horace13|Horace13]] 19:09, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
::You are absolutely right Ashly, but you had better have a word with Conservative. He has been over on the [[Atheism]] page asserting that it is for atheists to prove the non-existence of god.--[[User:Horace13|Horace13]] 19:09, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
==Arbitary blocking==
==Arbitary blocking==