nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + +
Conservapedia:AFD Gay Bowel Syndrome (view source)
Revision as of 23:31, October 3, 2007
, 23:31, October 3, 2007no edit summary
:::The article [[Gay Bowel Syndrome]] cites a 2004 article by Medscape saying that gay bowel syndrome is still a concern. More importantly, given the lethality of [[HIV]] and its connection with proctitus/gay bowel syndrome the article could save lives.[http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CID/journal/issues/v38n2/30832/30832.html?erFrom=-8997763093503343538Guest] I know Wikipedia would definitely censor this article because the liberal gay activists hate the term "gay bowel syndrome" and have been trying to get the medical establishment to not use the term because it strong associates homosexuality with disease. However, I do think that Conservapedia should warn its readers of the dangers of homosexual activity especially since the Bible states that homosexuality is wrong.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:30, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
:::The article [[Gay Bowel Syndrome]] cites a 2004 article by Medscape saying that gay bowel syndrome is still a concern. More importantly, given the lethality of [[HIV]] and its connection with proctitus/gay bowel syndrome the article could save lives.[http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CID/journal/issues/v38n2/30832/30832.html?erFrom=-8997763093503343538Guest] I know Wikipedia would definitely censor this article because the liberal gay activists hate the term "gay bowel syndrome" and have been trying to get the medical establishment to not use the term because it strong associates homosexuality with disease. However, I do think that Conservapedia should warn its readers of the dangers of homosexual activity especially since the Bible states that homosexuality is wrong.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:30, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
'''Delete.''' Everybody already knows that homosexuals are at higher risk for HIV/AIDS and other diseases; there is no reason to belabor the point by inserting pornographic content on a website viewed by many young people. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 19:31, 3 October 2007 (EDT)