Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:     
:This appears to be the sick pornography of [[User:Conservative|Conservative]]. I am disgusted and '''did not need to encounter this article'''. While we are at it, why not go ahead and have a full article describing gay sex!([[User:ErstBlenchPoet|ErstBlenchPoet]] 20:31, 3 October 2007 (EDT))
 
:This appears to be the sick pornography of [[User:Conservative|Conservative]]. I am disgusted and '''did not need to encounter this article'''. While we are at it, why not go ahead and have a full article describing gay sex!([[User:ErstBlenchPoet|ErstBlenchPoet]] 20:31, 3 October 2007 (EDT))
 +
::::The article [[Gay Bowel Syndrome]] does not describe an pornographic acts. It merely describes a medical condition which is the result of a homosexual act.  Deleting [[Gay Bowel Snydrome]] would be like deleting our [[AIDS]] article. Please show me specifically where the article is pornographic. It merely quotes medical publications. By the way, liberal gay activists hate the term "gay bowel syndrome" as I demonstrated in my article.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:36, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,387

edits

Navigation menu