51
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + +
User talk:ConserveATory (view source)
Revision as of 00:59, October 4, 2007
, 00:59, October 4, 2007replying to: →Question about AFD vote
I cited a medical publication [[MedCast]] which used the term [[Gay Bowel Syndrome]] in 2004. I also point out two reference sources which uses the term now. Also, a Canadian medical organization used the term in 2001. Also, MSN ENcarta used the term in 2001 until pressured by homosexual activists. Please review the [[Gay Bowel Syndrome]] article again and you will see my sources plus you will see the efforts of liberal gay activist to repress the use of the term [[Gay Bowel Syndrome]]. Will you please change your AFD vote after reviewing the article again? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:56, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
I cited a medical publication [[MedCast]] which used the term [[Gay Bowel Syndrome]] in 2004. I also point out two reference sources which uses the term now. Also, a Canadian medical organization used the term in 2001. Also, MSN ENcarta used the term in 2001 until pressured by homosexual activists. Please review the [[Gay Bowel Syndrome]] article again and you will see my sources plus you will see the efforts of liberal gay activist to repress the use of the term [[Gay Bowel Syndrome]]. Will you please change your AFD vote after reviewing the article again? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:56, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
:No, I won't. Being defined is not the same as being commonly used in medicine. There are sources, such as [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9328857&dopt=AbstractPlus this one] that point this out. There are much more productive things that you could do that don't involve discussing gay anal intercourse.[[User:ConserveATory|ConserveATory]] 20:59, 3 October 2007 (EDT)