Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,420
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 42:
Line 42: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia:AFD Gay Bowel Syndrome (view source)
Revision as of 02:16, October 4, 2007
, 02:16, October 4, 2007no edit summary
:::::::TK, i took your feedback. I specifically stated in the article that "gay bowel syndrome" is a condition where you get certain maladies with unusual frequency as a result of homosexual activity and that homosexuals are more apt to get this condition but that these maladies are not solely exclusive to male homosexuals. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:36, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
:::::::TK, i took your feedback. I specifically stated in the article that "gay bowel syndrome" is a condition where you get certain maladies with unusual frequency as a result of homosexual activity and that homosexuals are more apt to get this condition but that these maladies are not solely exclusive to male homosexuals. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:36, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
==Liberal bullying of the medical establishment plus other prominent conservative websites mention gay bowel syndrome==
I dislike it when the liberals bully the medical establishment or other entities.
A number of leading conservative websites mention "gay bowel syndrome" and here is just 3 but I could come up with more.[http://search.cwfa.org/find.html?id=4208944&pid=r&mode=ALL&query="gay%20bowel%20syndrome&t=s][http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v9/i1/homosexual.asp][http://www.traditionalvalues.org/pdf_files/Diseases.pdf] The disease "gay bowel syndorme" can signficantly increase the risk of dying of AIDS in homosexuals. For one symptom of "gay bowel syndrome" for example it increases your chance of getting AIDS by 9 times.
The homosexual activists are bullying the medical community and reference works to not mention or discuss "gay bowel syndrome" which medical authorities still use today. I think as a conservative encyclopedia we should mention it.
The article does not say anything racy and merely quotes medical journals.
Can you agree with me on this issue?
Sincerely,
Ken