Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 56: Line 56:  
::Yes, but some people were mistaken in their criticism.  The medical term is still used today and the article now reflects that.  Secondly, TK was not aware that the liberal homosexual activists were attempting to suppress medical science and now the article reflects that.  I do think it is fair that people give editors a reasonable amount of time to create an article and not throw out objections as an article is being created.  As the final article may address those points shortly as mine clearly did.  In short, if I had been given just a little more time the vote would be 4 to 4 and possibly be in my favor as one person said same as above. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:37, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
 
::Yes, but some people were mistaken in their criticism.  The medical term is still used today and the article now reflects that.  Secondly, TK was not aware that the liberal homosexual activists were attempting to suppress medical science and now the article reflects that.  I do think it is fair that people give editors a reasonable amount of time to create an article and not throw out objections as an article is being created.  As the final article may address those points shortly as mine clearly did.  In short, if I had been given just a little more time the vote would be 4 to 4 and possibly be in my favor as one person said same as above. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:37, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
 
:Yes, we should give you time to make the article worse.  Coming along nicely, I see.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 23:38, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
 
:Yes, we should give you time to make the article worse.  Coming along nicely, I see.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 23:38, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
 +
:::MichealS, I believe you are a liberal that is unreasonable and your posts here and your user page shows this.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:42, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,387

edits

Navigation menu