Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 59: Line 59:  
:That's an ad hominem attack, not an argument.  If you have something to say, please make the argument.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 23:43, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
 
:That's an ad hominem attack, not an argument.  If you have something to say, please make the argument.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 23:43, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
 
:::I quoted medical professionals and cited them. Your request for my medical credentials was a fluff objection as the people who are cited are clearly medical professions and qualified. You clearly have an agenda and are not interested in evidence. You are unreasonable.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:46, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
 
:::I quoted medical professionals and cited them. Your request for my medical credentials was a fluff objection as the people who are cited are clearly medical professions and qualified. You clearly have an agenda and are not interested in evidence. You are unreasonable.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:46, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
 +
Your articles are all links to pay portals.  Have you read every one of those sources (not just the quoted parts, mind you), as in, the whole articles?  If not, I wouldn't include them.  Linking w/o having read the article is a case of [[deceit]] :-O.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:02, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
92

edits

Navigation menu