Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 61: Line 61:  
Your articles are all links to pay portals.  Have you read every one of those sources (not just the quoted parts, mind you), as in, the whole articles?  If not, I wouldn't include them.  Linking w/o having read the article is a case of [[deceit]] :-O.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:02, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
 
Your articles are all links to pay portals.  Have you read every one of those sources (not just the quoted parts, mind you), as in, the whole articles?  If not, I wouldn't include them.  Linking w/o having read the article is a case of [[deceit]] :-O.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:02, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
 
:Isn't this the object, though?  Since those are pay sites, Conservative has given a free access summary.  And this single article has more educational value than all the rap, punk, and pop culture articles combined we have on this site.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:06, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
 
:Isn't this the object, though?  Since those are pay sites, Conservative has given a free access summary.  And this single article has more educational value than all the rap, punk, and pop culture articles combined we have on this site.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:06, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
 +
I'm sorry, but I don't trust Conservative to have accurately cited the articles.  Further, I think it best that his sourcing and citation be open for critics and admirers to see.  Also, it's extremely unencyclopedic to just take his word for it.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:11, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
92

edits

Navigation menu