Changes

Your articles are all links to pay portals.  Have you read every one of those sources (not just the quoted parts, mind you), as in, the whole articles?  If not, I wouldn't include them.  Linking w/o having read the article is a case of [[deceit]] :-O.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:02, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

Your articles are all links to pay portals.  Have you read every one of those sources (not just the quoted parts, mind you), as in, the whole articles?  If not, I wouldn't include them.  Linking w/o having read the article is a case of [[deceit]] :-O.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:02, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

:Isn't this the object, though?  Since those are pay sites, Conservative has given a free access summary.  And this single article has more educational value than all the rap, punk, and pop culture articles combined we have on this site.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:06, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

:Isn't this the object, though?  Since those are pay sites, Conservative has given a free access summary.  And this single article has more educational value than all the rap, punk, and pop culture articles combined we have on this site.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:06, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

I'm sorry, but I don't trust Conservative to have accurately cited the articles.  Further, I think it best that his sourcing and citation be open for critics and admirers to see.  Also, it's extremely unencyclopedic to just take his word for it.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:11, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

I'm sorry, but I don't trust Conservative to have accurately cited the articles.  Further, I think it best that ::::his sourcing and citation be open for critics and admirers to see.  Also, it's extremely unencyclopedic to just take his word for it.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:11, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

*Traditional values Coaltion and Concerned Women for America are precisely the sources we should be using and linking to for articles.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:21, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

*Traditional values Coaltion and Concerned Women for America are precisely the sources we should be using and linking to for articles.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:21, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

::They're not medical journals.  Let's see the medical journal cites.  Also, here's an article that elegantly disproves creationism.  You can access it [http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_QNPNQPT here], and the cited material is in the third paragraph.  What, no Economist password?  Oh, then just trust me.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:26, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

::They're not medical journals.  Let's see the medical journal cites.  Also, here's an article that elegantly disproves creationism.  You can access it [http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_QNPNQPT here], and the cited material is in the third paragraph.  What, no Economist password?  Oh, then just trust me.-[[User:MichaelS|MichaelS]] 00:26, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

Leaving aside questions of trust, it is clear that the vote is squarely against you, Conservative, with several sysops opposing the article. I believe that unless there is a significant change to the vote tally over the next day or so, the article should be deleted. [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 00:23, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

Leaving aside questions of trust, it is clear that the vote is squarely against you, Conservative, with several sysops opposing the article. I believe that unless there is a significant change to the vote tally over the next day or so, the article should be deleted. [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 00:23, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

:*We've been down this road on the discussion surrounding the AMA's decision to stop treating people seeking treatment for homosexuality. The APA's position statement says presiciely the decision is based upon social & political factors, not medical and scientific. So sorry, Maestro, that argument not only does not wash, it missed the point.

:We've been down this road on the discussion surrounding the AMA's decision to stop treating people seeking treatment for homosexuality. The APA's position statement says presiciely the decision is based upon social & political factors, not medical and scientific. So sorry, Maestro, that argument not only does not wash, it missed the point.

:*And SSchultz, we're not a moborcacy; if you wish to begin removing links we have in all the our pop culture articles to the home pages of rock groups that are [[Satan]] worshipers and begin replacing them with links to the TVC or CWA, somebody may pay more attention to you.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:49, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

:And SSchultz, we're not a mobocracy; if you wish to begin removing links we have in all the our pop culture articles to the home pages of rock groups that are [[Satan]] worshipers and begin replacing them with links to the TVC or CWA, somebody may pay more attention to you.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:49, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

== MichaelS ==

== MichaelS ==