930
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="red">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>+ − <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="orange">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>+ − <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="yellow">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>+ − <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="green">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>+ − <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="blue">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>+ − <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="indigo">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center> − <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="purple">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>
Reverted edits by Mark54 (Talk); changed back to last version by Samwell
In ''State v. Naramore'', 25 Kan. App. 2d 302, 322 (1998), the Supreme Court of [[Kansas]] overturned a conviction of Dr. Stan Naramore for administering large quantities of painkillers to two patients who subsequently died. It found that where there is a bona fide dispute in the medical community, then reasonable doubt about criminal intent exists as a matter of law. “[T]here is a reason why there has yet to be in Anglo-American law an affirmed conviction of a physician for homicide arising out of medical treatment based on such highly controverted expert evidence as here.” ''Id.''
The Tenth Circuit adhered to the Naramore ruling in reversing a conviction for involuntary manslaughter of a physician in connection with the death of a patient. ''United States v. Wood'', 207 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir. 2000). “Well-intentioned but inappropriate medical care, standing alone, does not raise an inference that a killing was deliberate, willful, and premeditated.” ''Id.'' at 1232.
[[Category:Law]]