| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="red">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>
| + | In ''United States v. Miller'', 307 U.S. 174 (1939), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] reversed the District Court's invalidation of the National Firearms Act, enacted in 1934. The Court held that the [[Second Amendment]] did not guarantee a citizen's right to possess a sawed-off shotgun because that weapon had not been shown to be "ordinary military equipment" that could "contribute to the common defense." ''Id.'' at 178. |
| − | <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="orange">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>
| + | |
| − | <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="yellow">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>
| + | The Court did not, however, attempt to define, or otherwise construe, the substantive right protected by the [[Second Amendment]]. |
| − | <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="green">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>
| + | |
| − | <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="blue">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>
| + | The Court did not address this issue again prior to 2008. |
| − | <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="indigo">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>
| + | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] |
| − | <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="purple">RAPTOR JESUS </font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>
| + | [[category:Second Amendment]] |