Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,469
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 5:
Line 5: − − :Ooops! Thanks buddy.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:23, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Talk:Prisoner's dilemma (view source)
Revision as of 02:11, October 6, 2007
, 02:11, October 6, 2007Reverted edits by SpeakerOfTheDead (Talk); changed back to last version by Spyder
::It doesn't make sense to me if A defects and B cooperates A will get 0 and B will get 5. If the U.S. were to nuke USSR and USSR cooperated who would end up winning? Because right now it looks like USSR would win. --[[User:Spyder|Spyder]] 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
::It doesn't make sense to me if A defects and B cooperates A will get 0 and B will get 5. If the U.S. were to nuke USSR and USSR cooperated who would end up winning? Because right now it looks like USSR would win. --[[User:Spyder|Spyder]] 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
== Censoring? ==
== Censoring? ==
Are we really censoring "tit for tat" to "t*t for tat"? That seems... a little... overboard?-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Are we really censoring "tit for tat" to "t*t for tat"? That seems... a little... overboard?-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 14:13, 7 May 2007 (EDT)