17
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: − If this wasn't biased, it most definitely would not be called "Conservapedia".+ + + + + +
no edit summary
==This site would be good if...==
# ...it changed its name to something neutral.
# ...it toned down all its anti-Wikipedia stance and its competitiveness with Wikipedia and acted as an independent information-souce.
# ...it disassociated itself with being "pro-American" and "pro-Christian" (not that there is anything wrong with them) and just focused on providing accurate, unbiased information.
That would be a great site. And with people like ColinR, it could work.