nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
11,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 107:
Line 107: + +
→Welcome back: re
::I don't agree with the idea of the contest. I feel like it would be more valuable to the wiki to have the editors involved in the contest spend time writing well-researched, well-thought-out articles instead of the mad-dash copying and pasting that the contest provokes. I don't feel like one or two line dictionary-style entries on neutral topics do anything for the wiki--that information is well documented at the original source and has no liberal spin, so I feel like a better use of the time occupied by the contest would be in writing truly Conservative-sided articles on important topics. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 19:50, 8 October 2007 (EDT)
::I don't agree with the idea of the contest. I feel like it would be more valuable to the wiki to have the editors involved in the contest spend time writing well-researched, well-thought-out articles instead of the mad-dash copying and pasting that the contest provokes. I don't feel like one or two line dictionary-style entries on neutral topics do anything for the wiki--that information is well documented at the original source and has no liberal spin, so I feel like a better use of the time occupied by the contest would be in writing truly Conservative-sided articles on important topics. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 19:50, 8 October 2007 (EDT)
:::Many of the topics here started as one or two-line articles and later were expanded. During this last contest, we were encouraged to contribute articles relating to the American Government course; it would be better to provide links here, then have them go somewhere else for an explanation. Perhaps a future contest can focus on the articles you describe. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 20:04, 8 October 2007 (EDT)
== Thanks! ==
== Thanks! ==