Changes

:I'm sorry, but I'm tired of this bending and twisting. Bold claims are replaced by even bolder ones, and reality warps around your every post. You have fun smearing Wikipedia. I did my duty as an editor by pointing out the extremely shaky ground this all is built on. It's up to a sysop to make a decision. I'm out of this discussion. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 20:57, 10 October 2007 (EDT)

:I'm sorry, but I'm tired of this bending and twisting. Bold claims are replaced by even bolder ones, and reality warps around your every post. You have fun smearing Wikipedia. I did my duty as an editor by pointing out the extremely shaky ground this all is built on. It's up to a sysop to make a decision. I'm out of this discussion. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 20:57, 10 October 2007 (EDT)

::Actually I was referring to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/examples#Are_wikis_reliable_sources.3FWikipedia: WP:Reliable sources/Examples/Are wikis reliable sources?], which reads, "Wikis, including Wikipedia and other wikis sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation are not regarded as reliable sources." But the author of this same language appears to have an appendage in the wringer at the moment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Proposed_decision&diff=160962861&oldid=160957768] over precisely the same conduct, i.e. she wrote the policy, at first refused to enforce it so as to protect an unreputable source, and when forcedto enforce the very policy she authored, took a reprisal action against the editor who brought the disparity to her attention.

::Actually I was referring to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/examples#Are_wikis_reliable_sources.3FWikipedia: WP:Reliable sources/Examples/Are wikis reliable sources?], which reads, "Wikis, including Wikipedia and other wikis sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation are not regarded as reliable sources." But the author of this same language appears to have an appendage in the wringer at the moment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Proposed_decision&diff=160962861&oldid=160957768] over precisely the same conduct, i.e. she wrote the policy, at first refused to enforce it so as to protect an unreputable source, and when forced to enforce the very policy she authored, took a reprisal action against the editor who brought the disparity to her attention.

::And that is not all; the Essjay controversy was born out efforts to coverup this duplicity.

::And that is not all; the Essjay controversy was born out efforts to coverup this duplicity.

::So when we evidence WP will begin abiding by its own policies, we may be in a position to cut it some slack & give it the benefit of the doubt.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:52, 10 October 2007 (EDT)

::So when we evidence WP will begin abiding by its own policies, we may be in a position to cut it some slack & give it the benefit of the doubt.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:52, 10 October 2007 (EDT)