Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: − + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Boys are more aggressive, girls more nurturing. Female babies react more to facial expressions, males to moving objects
Feminine character is better suited to the nurturing of young children. Women do not have breasts only for biological reasons, but the act of clasping one's child to her bosom is an essential part of mothering her children.
Feminine character is better suited to the nurturing of young children. Women do not have breasts only for biological reasons, but the act of clasping one's child to her bosom is an essential part of mothering her children.
Men make better hunters and software engineers.
La Griffe du Lion writes:
:Men and women exhibit other behavioral differences which are apparent almost from birth. To some extent they mirror sex-differentiated behavior in animals. Boys are more aggressive, girls more nurturing. Female babies react more to facial expressions, males to moving objects. By adolescence these behaviors have morphed into girls' interest in social relationships, and boys' interest in machines and devices. Obviously, such divergence of interests influences career choices. Girls lean more toward fields like psychology, while similarly talented men incline toward engineering or physical science. <ref> [http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/math.htm Sex Differences in Mathematical Aptitude] </ref>
==Social engineernig==
Radical Feminists have often claimed that gender differences are not innate, let alone God-given. They do this to bolster their argument that men and women should be treated equally in society. They want women to have all the advantages and opportunities that men have.
The problem with the feminist view (or agenda) is that it assumes the truth of its own dogma. It simply asserts that gender differences are a [[social construct]], but without supplying any proof of this. Worse, they refuse to consider any evidence in favor of innate differences.
In a well known example in 2006, the President Lawrence Summers of Harvard University was forced to recant remarks he had made about the percentage of women in mathematics. Summers had suggested (in a private meeting) that the lopsided proportion might not be due to prejudice or discrimination, but a simply factor such as personal inclination or aptitude.
==Notes==
<references/>