12
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + + + +
no edit summary
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:47, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:47, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
The brain of ''Archaeopteryx'' had already been CT scanned, see here:http://www.utexas.edu/opa/pubs/oncampus/02oc_issues/oc020702/oc_brain.html. ''Archaeopteryx'''s brain was not like modern birds, so it was harder to interpret; the new paper scanned an intermediate bird's fossil skull, which greatly helped paleontologists understand the orginal CT scan of ''Archaeopteryx'''s brain. It was not like that of modern birds, it is more like a ''Velociraptor'' or oviraptorid in organization.
If you are going to remove actual peer-reviewd data because "it requires payment" (I don't like it either, but they have to make money somehow) while keeping easily-refuted information that has never made it to a scientific journal in your entries then you are making the conservapedia into a joke.