Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,634
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 88:
Line 88: − +
→Michael Moore: redun
==Michael Moore==
==Michael Moore==
The website MichaelMoore.com, dissatisfied with a Wikipedia editor's edits to ''[[Sicko]]'', published an image of a Wikipedia user on its main page. This was combined with links to edit both ''Sicko'' and the editor's user page and updates on the "controversy". [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Proposed_decision#Michael_Moore] This was combined with direct links to the Wikipedia editors user page. Several Wikipedia editors and Administrators regarded this action on the part of [[Michael Moore]]'s official website as a violation of a previous well publicized ruling regarding external sites harassment of Wikipedia editors. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Evidence#Michael_Moore][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Evidence#Michael_Moore_2] The consensus, per Wikipedia's existing policy was to remove links from Wikipedia to Michael Moore's attack site which was urging vengence and reprisals against an editor who posted criticism of Moore's film.
The website MichaelMoore.com, dissatisfied with a Wikipedia editor's edits to ''[[Sicko]]'', published an image of a Wikipedia user on its main page. This was combined with links to edit both ''Sicko'' and the editor's user page.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Proposed_decision#Michael_Moore] Several Wikipedia editors and Administrators regarded this action on the part of [[Michael Moore]]'s official website as a violation of a previous well publicized ruling regarding external sites harassment of Wikipedia editors. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Evidence#Michael_Moore][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Evidence#Michael_Moore_2] The consensus, per Wikipedia's existing policy was to remove links from Wikipedia to Michael Moore's attack site which was urging vengence and reprisals against an editor who posted criticism of Moore's film.
In Arbitration, Wikipedia's internal policy making and dispute resolution process, the Arbitration chairman publicly admitted,
In Arbitration, Wikipedia's internal policy making and dispute resolution process, the Arbitration chairman publicly admitted,