1,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
no edit summary
: MountainDew, in a word yes. The argument is actually one of the most painfully flawed of all creationist arguments- the 2nd law as a statement of entropy levels only applies to closed systems and the Earth (where evolution is occuring) is not a closed system. Furthermore, it isn't even clear that evolution decreases the local level of entropy anyways. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 00:55, 5 March 2007 (EST)
: MountainDew, in a word yes. The argument is actually one of the most painfully flawed of all creationist arguments- the 2nd law as a statement of entropy levels only applies to closed systems and the Earth (where evolution is occuring) is not a closed system. Furthermore, it isn't even clear that evolution decreases the local level of entropy anyways. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 00:55, 5 March 2007 (EST)
:On the contrary, 2nd law is indeed violated on the quantum scale, and even on the macro scale if you wait a ''very'' long time. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 11:38, 13 March 2007 (EDT)