7
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + − '''Archives:'''+ + − [[User talk:MountainDew]]+ + + − [[User talk:DanHarchive1]]+ + + + + − == unicode ==+ + + − Do you know how to use unicode to avoid the spam filter? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:30, 11 July 2007 (EDT)+ − *I am sure you read all that on that other wiki. Check with them. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 22:57, 12 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − == Vandal? == − So I'm a "vandal" am I? Clean out your ears, knucklehead, because I'm about to tell you something about real vandals. The real Vandals were a race of pagan barbarian murderers and thieves who swept across Europe killing anyone who got in the way of their "fun." Know who does that sound like? Not me, certainly. Maybe it sounds like those stupid teenagers you cater to on this site, who just want to "get high" and play their little murder simulators, no matter what it's doing to their family, their culture, or their country. − When I found this place, I thought it was finally the venue(look it up if you don't know what it means) for truth about dangerous parts of popular culture like Dungeons and Dragons and violent video games. You try to insert some truth into the articles over on Wacopedia, and you get shot down by mindless liberals chanting their little mantras "It's just a game," "You're a close minded fanatic," and "Get a life." I've got a life, junior, and it's a lot better than yours because I go OUTSIDE once and a while. But this was supposed to be where people can showcase a conservative(read: realistic) viewpoint on this filth. And when I come back, what do I find? Some scrawny little coward had deleted all my work and called me a "vandal." − YOU are the real vandals, peddling this smut to young children who come here to escape from the cesspit that is Wacopedia. Their loving parents see all the conservative trappings here and say, "Oh, this must be safe," but most probably never take the time to actualy read the idiotic and subversive lies you present as truth. Let's take a look, shall we? − The article on video games has pages full of nice, harmless sounding fluff, but how much information does it have on the scientificly proven pyschological effects they have on people who become violent and obsessed from playing them? A SINGLE line at the very bottom of the page about Grand Theft Auto, which everyone has already heard about and a comment from some pixelante about how we shouldn't "judge" video games based on what "a couple crazy kids did." That's the same tired rhetoric used by hippies who want their pot legalized. "Hey, man, a couple of people kill each other over drugs. But, like, the ends(brainwashed teenagers having "fun") justify the means(the death of the innocent" Here's an idea. Get out of your parent's basement and try actually living life, instead of rehearse taking the lives of those who are actually doing something worthwhile. − Your article on Dungeons and Dragons is also very telling. It's got three sections on how to play the game, and I counted at least six different places where criticism is deflected, and that's without reading the section on the "Magic System" (I don't worship the devil, and I'm not planning on casting any magic spells anytime soon, so why on earth would I read a section about how to do so?). I wander how parents would feel if they found out your website had occult knowledge right out in the open? But, hey, I suppose "If it feels good, do it." And if anybody trys to stop us, we can just plug our fingers in our ears and concentrate on something that makes us feel all warm and fuzzy inside, like how your article on Hitler calls him evil. Well, duh!. A bunch of book burners is what you are, heeping all the truth about anything wrong that isn't one of your pet causes onto the bonfire with your morals and common decency.+ − My page on "anime," as these perverted freak call it, was mangled. Your little slant eyed toadie, [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] Morals, only had the courage to put a little note at the end about how well this sick "art" blends into porn.(Of course, some little brain fried deliquent has already subtely changed even that, so it sounds much less disgusting than it really is.) I can only thank God that you left enough of my message in that parents will be able to see the link to porn, and stop their kids from becoming ignorant sociopaths, kinda like most of the people on this site.+ − And finally let's look at your little advertisement for online games(your page on Massively Multiplayer Online Roleplaying Games, in case you don't know). I clicked on a few, then went back and got rid of the links to protect children from smut. I even put a note saying that they weren't family friendly. And what did one of you little cowards do? Put them back and said "I hope he's not right about them not being family friendly." Here's a novel ideal, why don't you actually CHECK? Then you could see all the violence, New Age idealogy, and practical nudity in these "family friendly" websites. But you won't do that. I'm on to you. You've probably got a little side deal with the game companies. You give them free advertising with a spin that makes it seem like their product is harmless, and you get some money for the advertising. − That just makes me sick. These children come to you for the facts without the bias and lies most media shoves down their throats. And what do you do? Line them up and march them right into the hands of the gaming companies that don't care if people get hurt or if society is degraded, as long as they can make a buck. Most gaming companies are Japanese, did you know that? Or where you too distracted by counting your shiny silver coins to actually research what you were doing? Sure, but who cares right. Aren't the Japanese Buddhist? So they believe in love and peace, right? Islam is the FASTEST GROWING religion in the world. You're kidding yourself if you think none of the Japs have converted so they could get their 72 virgins. Even a search on the internet will show you thousands of site about people who have stolen, killed themselves or others, and wasted their lives on twisted "entertainment." How many repeats of Columbine will it take before you wake up and do your part to stop this insanity?+ − But, I suppose this will fall on deaf ears. After all, George Washington said "Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder." But you don't really understand what you're selling. Will you still mock me when it one of YOUR friends or loved ones who gets gunned down by some pale, greasy gamer who's driving down the street thinking the people he's shooting aren't real, or kidnapped so some lunatic in a black robe can sacrifice them to his Dungeons and Dragons gods(who are really demons) so he can get a better result for his latest spell? Will you still think that it's all just "harmless fun" and that you don't need to warn people about a very real danger to themselves and their families then? You can do the right thing. You can stop censoring people who come here to expose the truth. You could save a life by stopping some innocent little boy from growing up to be a deranged killer. + − I'm probably wasting my time though. You've probably already thrown away your mind, drooling over the latest murder simulator with all the biggest looking swords and "coolest" spells. People who try to spread the truth are always harrassed and mocked, but good always wins in the end. Hopefully, enough people will read this and do a little research on these subjects. Then they'll try to clear up the lies and misconceptions you have all over this place. They'll get censored and thrown out of course. But soon, enough people will see through these blatant advertisments for this smut and try to correct it you'll be doing nothing but trying to stem the tide of light into the tangle of biased nonsense you're using to shield your spineless business partners, who have to use tactics like this because they're to cowardly to come out in the open and defend their dangerous product. And do you know why? Because they can't. I know it, they know it, and, deep down, you know it too. + − I'll be praying that somehow you find it in your heart(or at least the part that hasn't been destroyed by the dehumanizing messages these things send) to help spread the truth. + − (P.S. Oh, and I'm not Jack Chick. Contrary to what you might believe, there is more than one person in this country with that name.) − : This post wins the internet. Anyways, if I were to guess, it's this guy. [http://www.jackthompson.org/] --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 22:52, 12 July 2007 (EDT) − ::This might be the funniest thing I have ever read [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 23:26, 12 July 2007 (EDT) − *He seemed "normal" to me on other issues. But then I have no idea what sparked his post, or anything else.... --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 23:33, 12 July 2007 (EDT) − Just to nitpick, at the time the Vandals attacked the Roman empire and took over North Africa, they were Arian Christian, not pagan.--[[User:Epicurius|Steve]] 12:11, 13 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − == reminder ==+ − does the word [[Hannibal]] mean anything to you? <small>heh heh heh</small>[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 02:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)+ − I'll have to get that tomorrow morning; I'm going out of town for three days. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 02:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT) − == Uh-oh... == − looks like we have a Jack Thompson impersonator trying to take you out, Dan. Or worse yet, Jack himself... I shudder at the mere thought. Be vigiliant, don't bend, we will defend you, Dan. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 19:02, 13 July 2007 (EDT) − + + + + − ::*ROFL!! Yeah, like he's something to fear, Thompson! You guys kill me sometimes, giving him the reaction he wants, lol. Good idea, Elamdri! --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 19:11, 13 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − ::::Dunno about you, Terry, but an opportunity to take on Thompson ''mano y mano'' is something I would relish. I hope the article I'm about to write about him attracts his wrath.--<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 19:15, 13 July 2007 (EDT)+ − :::::::NOOO, you blocked him! How am I gonna have any fun now?--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:15, 13 July 2007 (EDT)+ − − :::::::::::I somewhat doubt he's Jack Thompson, he even denied it. But still, wouldn't it be something if we got the real Jack Thompson to come sniffing around?--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:18, 13 July 2007 (EDT) − ::::::::::::As of today, that's my new goal. We know he'll find us sooner or later (he gave Wikipedia quite a headache), so let's school him quickly and get it over with. Let's move this discussion to the sysop page, agreed? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 19:21, 13 July 2007 (EDT) − *Hoji, AIM! --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 19:24, 13 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − == Congratulations Div. Chess Champ! ==+ + − Go Dan! --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 23:50, 15 July 2007 (EDT)+ + + − ==Ranger Bill==+ − Sorry, I didn't do that!! My little sister (didn't ask me or anything) just put it up using my user name. Sorry that it happened.--[[User:Tash|Tash]] 15:12, 16 July 2007 (EDT)+ − == Dan, evolution article ==+ − Dear Dan,+ + − My sister stated to me that the [[theory of evolution]] article was a very good article but she said, "What about the man-ape fossils?". So I added the [[paleoanthropology]] section which a leading creationist organization is going to publish at their website. I also noticed that [[Wikipedia]] did the social effects of the theory of evolution in their [[evolution]] article so I added that very briefly. I also noticed that a HUGE issue was left out and that was biological information, biological code, and genetic programs so I added a brief section. + + − As far as today, Andy added some material that I thought needed better footnoting and wording so that is what I was doing today. − I do think the end result was worth it. Out of 112 million articles on Google for the Theory of evolution ours is ranked #34. − [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:00, 16 July 2007 (EDT) − == Chess ==+ + − Congratulations on winning. Not bad for a Jayhawk. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 11:03, 17 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − :Yes...congratulations! I was always horrible at chess...I just move a piece and see what happens...the word strategy does not exist in my dictionary :) [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 12:42, 17 July 2007 (EDT)+ − ::Congratulations. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 15:34, 17 July 2007 (EDT) − Thanks all. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:35, 17 July 2007 (EDT)+ − :Belated congrats! --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''ηοξιμαχονγ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|θαλκ]]</font></sup> 13:08, 18 July 2007 (EDT)+ − == Would you please categorize... ==+ − the article on [[pornography]]? If I read the history correctly you are the protecting sysop so I figured you'd like first crack at it. May I suggest something simple like "media" for now? I have plans to re-organize many category structures but at the moment that's likely to be your best fit. Of course, you should do as you see fit. Regards, [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 18:09, 17 July 2007 (EDT) ''<-I'm just doing them alphabetically, honest!+ − + + − :Would you also please categorize [[Main Page/new style]]? Thank you, [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 12:14, 18 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − == Good Catch ==+ + − ...On the user name "Bush is retarded" spelt backwards. Of course I guess I should expect that from a chess champion. ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 04:17, 18 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − ==Hitler's vegetarianism==+ − Hi. What exactly is your source that Hitler wasn't a vegetarian? I've read numerous places that he was, including, I believe, the memoirs of his friend Albert Speer. Is the argument that he wasn't a ''strict'' vegetarian? Because there are numerous definitions of vegetarianism, and some allow for limited meat ingestion. If I recall, his reasons were health and not animal ights, but I don't think that matters. [[User:PortlyMort|PortlyMort]] 14:37, 18 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − There's at the very least, enough controversy about whether he was [http://www.slate.com/id/2096259/] that we shouldn't dogmatically say one way or the other. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:38, 18 July 2007 (EDT)+ + + − :Hitler's personal chef says his favourite dish was pigeon [http://veg.ca/content/view/171/113/]; it seems from various other sources that while he ''preferred'' a vegetarian diet, he deviated enough from it to not be classed as a vegetarian. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 14:46, 18 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − ::Sources are numerous. One source of good criticism cites how Hitler was not sympathetic to German soldiers freezing in Russia who asked for meat. Hitler went into a long spiel about how the Roman legions survived on grains, etc., and probably regarded meat eaters as subversive to the Nazi effort. Ultimately, many meat eaters probably betrayed the Nazi cause because of this--Hitler just didn't care if meat eaters got fed or not, and expected everybody to be like him and make the same sacrifices during the privations of a prolonged war, which of course to a vegetarian of many years, are not sacrifices at all. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:52, 18 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − :::The sources for his meat eating and love of ham and bavarian sausages are numerous also [http://www.foodrevolution.org/askjohn/47.htm]; many commentators also point out that Hitler never claimed to be a vegetarian, outlawed vegetarian organizations and prevented all measures aimed at easing Germany’s food shortages that involved a reduction in meat consumption. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 14:59, 18 July 2007 (EDT) − == Request ==+ − + − == Thanks ==+ − Thank you for welcoming me, DanH. [[User:BrianJackson|BrianJackson]] 20:37, 20 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − Thank you for unblocking me, it is greatly appreciated -Mr.Random+ + − Thanks for fixing the [[Ruth Ann Minner]] article. I was just about to fix it, and you beat me to it. ;-) --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 11:22, 30 September 2007 (EDT)+ + − == Grunge ==+ − I agree. A lot of post-grunge bands really ruined grunge. Everclear,Third Eye Blind,Matchbox 20, and even Daughtry (he was classified post-grunge too lol) really turned grunge to pop - rock. − (whoops forgot to sign)+ + − + + + + + + − Favorite Original Grunge Band: Alice In Chains+ + + + + + + + − Favorite Post-Grunge: Three Days Grace or Breaking Benjamin+ + − + − == Great block! ==+ − Great block! Well done!!!!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:24, 23 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − : Wow, a second great block in the same night!!! Very well done.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:35, 23 July 2007 (EDT)+ − == thanks ==+ + − The user who put those questionable comments was a sock of vandal redhungary, who I think you dealt with earlier. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 23:04, 23 July 2007 (EDT)+ − == Noah's ark ==+ − Heya -- I'm interested in making some changes to Noah's ark -- proposed them on the talk page -- any chance you could try unlocking it for a while and see if revert wars and/or vandalism become a problem? [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 21:30, 25 July 2007 (EDT)+ − == Please protect my signature templates ==+ − The templates in question are:+ − *[[User:PheasantHunter/TestTalk]] − *[[User:PheasantHunter/FullSig]] − − *[[User:PheasantHunter/sig]] − + − == Vandal blocking ==+ − :Good job blocking the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=DanH&page= vandals]. [[User:JohnMorrisonBirch|JohnMorrisonBirch]] 21:20, 26 July 2007 (EDT) − == Crop Circles ==+ − Dear Dan+ + + + + + − I wander why you removed the information about Stonehenge. It is now in the middle of an explanation as you can see in the talk page of that article. According to the theory (?) it is a geometrical pattern and consequently a "crop circle" (near a Myth?). Neither Jazzman831 nor you asked me about it before deleting. That is not the right way to collaborate. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 15:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − *Joaquin my friend, I beleive I asked you to post in the sysop area about this, no? Please do so. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 20:03, 26 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − == Deletion Request ==+ + − Hi, you're an admin here, right? Could you delete [[Charlesincharge]]?--[[User:Offeep|Offeep]] 22:31, 27 July 2007 (EDT)+ + + − == revert on Guillotine ==+ − Why is it liberal bias to cite a fact? Capital punishment is indeed contrary to the French constitution following a vote of the French Parliament, in April 2007. I do not understand why you reverted this?[[User:Sporean|Sporean]] 13:15, 29 July 2007 (EDT)+ + − It probably wasn't, but the term First World seems to imply that. Maybe as in most of Europe, or in much of the world would be a way to put it. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:16, 29 July 2007 (EDT)+ − :OK. By the way, thank you for having moved [[Maximilien de Robespierre]]. [[User:Sporean|Sporean]] 13:17, 29 July 2007 (EDT)+ − == I would appreciate your support ==+ + − Dear DanH,+ + − I am sending you a note about the [[Template:Uncited|uncited template]] and how it can substantially increase web traffic to Conservapedia. + + − The Conservapedia article on [[homosexuality]] is now ranked in the top 10 of http://www.google.com searches. I estimate that the Conservapedia article on homosexuality is giving 300-400 people new people a day to know about Conservapedia who wouldn't otherwise know about it. When the article is in the top 5 of the search engine rankings it will bring in SUBSTANTIALLY more as the top 5 entries get the lion's share of the internet traffic. − Now a main reason why the Conservapedia homosexuality article is ranked in the top 10 is that the search engines highly reward articles with footnotes that link to other internet websites. Accordingly, since our uncited template is successful in getting people to cite their material as Andy Schlafly stated, I made note of the uncited template in the following Conservapedia articles: − Conservapedia:Commandments: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Commandments − Conservapedia Manual of Style: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style+ + − Conservapedia:Footnotes - technical help+ − http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Footnotes_-_technical_help − Currently about 50% of Conservapedia articles are completely uncited and a high percentage of articles that are cited are poorly cited. If this persist, not many people are going to know about Conservapedia as our articles will be poorly ranked by the search engines. However, I strongly believe that the uncited template will make a substantial difference.+ + − Accordingly, I would appreciate your efforts in supporting the [[Template:Uncited|uncited template]]. + + + + − [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:33, 29 July 2007 (EDT)+ + + + + − '''*Conservative, around here, it is the practice of all Sysops, except you, to discuss changes before implementing them, and asking for support. The Commandments may only be changed upon direct approval from Andy. You did not receive this direct approval, no? Kindly try and act like a mannered person, post your proposals to the Sysops and Andy, then be prepared for discussion and support, not the other way around. ''I could support your idea, except for the encouragement of placing templates without limitiation. We have far too much clutter already, and your failing to limit template placement, by stating some guideline for what a minimum number of citations is, will lead to chaos and endless debate as to how many are too few and how many are "enough". '' Thanks. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|--Talk 2 Me]]</sub> 15:58, 29 July 2007 (EDT)'''+ − :::TK, that is untrue as my message on the indicated pages clearly indicates the template is to be placed on a article or section of an article that are COMPLETELY uncited. It also gives the template for merely indicating a sentence that is uncited. Lastly, my''' cited''' articles are clearly bringing internet traffic and the uncited articles are not only breaking the conservapedia commandment about citing your sources but they are creating Conservapedia articles filled with unverifiable or hard to verify information. Plus uncited articles are not making a significant impact in regards to bringing in search engine traffic. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:07, 29 July 2007 (EDT)+ − == stonehenge ==+ − DanH, please do not revert me again. My new post states: broke conservapedia commandments. uncited material. please do not allow the conservapedia commandment breakers to reign freely. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:59, 29 July 2007 (EDT)+ − == Sc/nthorpe ==+ − Why did you delete this? It is a significant town in the English East Midlands and a major centre of steel production. Just because some people have dirty minds, and CP has an absurdly oversensitive spam filter, is no reason for it not to be listed. [[User:Pachyderm|Pachyderm]] 07:29, 31 July 2007 (EDT) − == revert ==+ − Sorry Dan, but I had to revert you. The name of the city is Чорнобиль or ''chornobyl'', but in the russian language it is Чернобыль or ''chernobyl''. The city is both Ukrainian and in Ukraine. I have moved the article so now the link works. Its alot like Kyiv <small>the correct way </small> and Kiev <small> the wrong russian way</small>. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 02:34, 2 August 2007 (EDT)+ − *I shall be informing Putin of your treason. Run! --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 04:21, 2 August 2007 (EDT)+ + + − == [[Mitt Romney]] ==+ + − + − == Flying machine revert ==+ − Why did you do it? My bit was accurate and on point.[[User:Bafi|Bafi]] 20:57, 4 August 2007 (EDT)+ − == [[Professional wrestling]] ==+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + − Could you delete [[Professional wrestling]]? It was created by the [[User:Dragonman|vandal]] you just blocked. Thanks. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazzman831]] 17:13, 5 August 2007 (EDT)+ − − ==Transcluded text== − − Hi, Mountain Dew! I created [[Template:Famine of 1933]] as [[transcluded text]]. You or anyone can edit it easily, because there is a special [[edit link]] in all three articles which invoke the template. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:58, 9 August 2007 (EDT) − − Ah! That's really cool, and easy to work in. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:00, 9 August 2007 (EDT) − − == TO: DanH from Conservative == − − Dear Dan, − − Please read the email I just sent you. − − [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:47, 15 August 2007 (EDT) − − == cabsmith == − − Who is cabsmith? I don't even see a history of any contributions of that user. [[User:DaiseyCutter|DaiseyCutter]] 18:28, 18 August 2007 (EDT) − − − Somebody who shared your IP with you when you were in Atlanta a week ago, or whatever it may be. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:33, 18 August 2007 (EDT) − − :I am lost. But am I not allowed to participate here? [[User:DaiseyCutter|DaiseyCutter]] 18:35, 18 August 2007 (EDT) − − == Hurricane == − − Yes, Thank you! I have been working here all the time but very little, except when I went for holidays at the end of July. − − --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 21:26, 26 August 2007 (EDT) − − == Beetle == − − Umm, okay, why did you revert my edit? Did I do something wrong? − − *On every edit screen you see this message: − − <blockquote> − "Please note that all contributions to Conservapedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then don't submit it here." − </blockquote> − --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 19:41, 29 August 2007 (EDT) − − == Laura Ingraham == − − Sorry, I did not see your edit. But... − − As I understand, "See also" is a way to promote what we have in CP that is more or less related to the article or that could be interesting to the reader. It is NOT an extension of the subject. − − − --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 11:11, 1 September 2007 (EDT) − − ==Tancredo Image== − Here is a public domain picture of him that I found (Image:Tom_Tencredo.jpg), but I can't upload it to the page since its locked. The picture still has to be protected also. --[[User:Tash|Tash]] 18:42, 7 September 2007 (EDT) − − ==Unresponsive== − I emailed you a while ago (like 2 weeks probably) concerning a ban. You either didn't get it because you didn't check your email or you just choose to ignore it (the latter being the more likely). So i'm sorry but should you really be a sysop when you act this rediculous? Anyways, email me back explaining your actions and please dont try to ban me saying that I harrased you or something stupid like that... − − --[[User:Maverick|Maverick]] 13:06, 11 September 2007 (EDT) − − He might not, but I will. Read the instructions on the block notice. Bye. − * BlakJack (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 18:13, 11 September 2007) (Earliest: 18:13, 11 September 2007) [1] − * Maverick (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 18:07, 11 September 2007) (Earliest: 18:06, 11 September 2007) [2] − 204.169.xx.xxx − --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 14:21, 11 September 2007 (EDT) − − hey Dan, why did you take out my [[antichrist]] edit. Those of us who believe that the Lord is returning are seeing the signs. Why can't we put out the view that the antichrist is here? − − We are not in the business of gossip here, and determining who the Antichrist is. Only God knows. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:09, 18 September 2007 (EDT) − − :Dan, perhaps we need an article called [[Views of the Antichrist]], expressing major denominational perspectives. Some Christian denominations believe a person such as this must appear, as a pre-condition before the second coming. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:25, 18 September 2007 (EDT) − − *It is good news to see Ed will be quadrupling his on line time here! Of course we would need his help in patrolling that article, and all the flames it would engender...lol. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 16:56, 18 September 2007 (EDT) − − ::Four times 0.01 is only 0.04 ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:24, 18 September 2007 (EDT) − − *Well, as your official spokesperson, I can chip in an additional 0.04, making an almost thousand-sold increase in your presence! :p --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 17:33, 18 September 2007 (EDT) − − == Alan Keyes == − − You are welcome! My pleasure. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 19:12, 18 September 2007 (EDT) − − == I sent you a important email == − − I sent you a important email. If you could get back to me as soon as possible I would appreciate it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:31, 18 September 2007 (EDT) − − == small request == − − Dan, thanks for getting back to me. I cannot understand why you didn't get my email. I would hate to type out another one only to have you not get that one either. Could you send me a email via the conservapedia system? It only has to say, "Hi, Conservative. This is DanH." − [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:11, 19 September 2007 (EDT) − :::This way here I would have your email address. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:12, 19 September 2007 (EDT) − − == Conservative links == − − Andy wants us to make explanation for the links set in this article. Could you help? Thanks! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 07:47, 21 September 2007 (EDT) − − ==Contest== − How about joining team one (to be named) in the contest?--[[User:Tash|Tash]] 18:54, 22 September 2007 (EDT) − − ==Articles related to me== − Hi these articles are articles I created or largely expanded in Wikipidea.--[[User:Validquest|Validquest]] 15:20, 23 September 2007 (EDT) − − most the internal links will be filled, I am looking forward to expand this article. I understand your concerns about Wiki/robot work. I wil make sure I improve the articles, use proper references and every internal link in any of my articles will lead to a new article that I will create, regards.--[[User:Validquest|Validquest]] 15:37, 23 September 2007 (EDT) − − ==Grammar== − − Hi, thanks for fixing up my grammar like that. I wrote that in kind of a hurry so next time I do something like that I'll fix it up better. [[User:Graham|Graham]] 12:19, 24 September 2007 (EDT) − − == Pliocene == − − Thanks for catching that. I forget that frequently. I'm a YEC but I have some OEC sympathies. [[User:SkipJohnson|SkipJohnson]] 22:18, 9 October 2007 (EDT) − − == Hi Dan == − − I like your additions to the Mississippi River article. I was wondering if you'd like to help out on filling in the [[Great Lakes]]? [[User:Mathers|ItMathers]] 23:27, 9 October 2007 (EDT) − − == Block == − You blocked my account shepherd and I was wondering what the reason was? I don't understand what a block of ice has to do with it thanks.[[User:Conservativ|Conservativ]] 22:55, 13 October 2007 (EDT) − :We don't like little wedges of ice mascarading as aliens who use proxy routes from Chicago and Alabama by way of Fairbanks...so no thanks. And have a nice day! [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 22:58, 13 October 2007 (EDT) − ::Wait, are you saying that I am wedgeice using a proxy I am not![[User:Respect|Respect]] 23:16, 13 October 2007 (EDT) − :::I just logged on and I was blocked by someone called SusanB − − ==Liberal support for creationism== − − Dan, I noticed you had to revert this talk page comment [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fred_Phelps&diff=next&oldid=316287]; I just wanted to put on record that we then have evidence that some high profile liberals actually are openminded. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:28, 14 October 2007 (EDT) − − I'd be interested in seeing that, but I was more reverting it because we had also reverted all the mainspace and talk page edits of that user's other sock puppets. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:36, 14 October 2007 (EDT) − − == quick note == − − Dear Dan, − − I wish to courteously and kindly make a request of you. Andy said he liked the my new material very much in regards to the Dawkins article. Please keep it in. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:44, 14 October 2007 (EDT) − − == thanks for the deletion == − − I was trying to make the best of a bad situation. :) [[User:Mathers|ItMathers]] 22:44, 15 October 2007 (EDT) − − :I getting very angered. Why different rules of me? {{unsigned|TeteLLM}}- - 12:06, 16 October 2007 TeteLLM − − == Interesting == − − Interesting addition to the [[Theodore Roosevelt]] entry. By the way, [[Kansas University]] is in the news for topping $1 billion in its endowment. :-) --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:17, 17 October 2007 (EDT) − − == Link == − − Dan, here's the link on KU's endowment: [http://www.nebraska.tv/Global/story.asp?S=7220297&nav=menu605_2] − − − ==Vandal== − − I found a vandal named spoonboy. It seems that he deliberately changed information on the Post-Diluvian Diasporas article in order to make a mockery out of Conservapedia. He also messed up the link on the page. Please examine his edits and take action if necessary. [[User:Lukecorlando|Lukecorlando]] 22:04, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
no edit summary
[[Image:Banhammer2.jpg|thumb|600px|left|'''DanH''' is hereby awarded the prestigious & coveted '''Banhammer''' barnstar for tireless vigilence against fascists, liberals, vandals & trolls.]]
User talk:DanHarchive1
From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Contents [hide]
1 Much Better
2 Thatcher
3 ?
4 Big edits
5 Thanks!
6 Main Page
7 Lazarus
8 Good luck
9 vandals
10 Please vote for me
11 Eagle...
12 Question
13 Grandpa!
14 Hey Dan
15 New Age
16 Budapest
17 Beaver ?
18 Just wondering
19 NAMBLA
20 Mammon
21 User:JeffersonDarcy
22 Vandal
23 Polap Srewdna
24 You can talk to me directly
25 Page Delete Request
26 Bohdan
27 Simpsons are really liberal
28 Vandal attacks
29 Here is something I put on the main page regarding getting more web traffic to Conservapedia
30 Page deletions
31 Faggot
32 Question
33 From Conservapedian
34 Image Protection
35 IP Trace and Madison
36 images
37 Vladimir Putin
38 Thanks
39 commandments broken
40 good work
41 Leo Tolstoy
42 Reverts
43 Monetzuma deletion
44 Thanks for your positive comments
45 Blocked yet again
46 Blocking of Ian St John
47 Hangarian dinosaurs
48 Thanks
Much Better
Nice suit, fits real good. Do you like mine? Rob Pommertalk
Thatcher
Would you have objections to the Thatcher edits? The article was clearly one sided, which is not in the spirit of this encyclopedia.
See first result for "The lady is not for turning" Thatcher at Google and the results at Google for "There is no such thing as society" Thatcher back that one up too.
Its easy to check stuff like that instead of deleting other people's good work. It annoys them and they leave. Aschlafly can't manage this project on his own. Auld Nick 15:38, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
The user who put those in had put other false information in this and other articles. I didn't know what was real and what wasn't. DanH 15:40, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
?
Cut what out exactly?
I didn't add any of the names...I simply tidied up the page, like the table. Wattylfc 15:37, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
Big edits
Thanks for the tip. Why the name change, MountainDew? GodlessLiberal 17:54, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
I see... I don't think your old discussion page redirects to your new one. Might want to put a redirect in there too so people don't get confused. GodlessLiberal 17:56, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
Thanks!
Thanks for blocking Iamwhoiam. I hate having to sit here and revert all that nonsense when I can be contributing to articles! --Thammersmith 15:19, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
Thanks for the revert! Crocoite Talk 18:19, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
Main Page
i did not write the comment on encyclopediac standards. I deleted the f word in the comment and you banned the user.Bohdan 01:16, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I took a screen shot of those ban messages lol. I shall post them under the heading "Look what conservapeida bans you for". Indeed. I shall never run our of IPs dude so why ban me?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
will you not ban me if i just stay on talk pages?
Oh well ban me if you want i need to get a good night sleep school tomorow.
Have a nice night (or day depending on your geologial position)
Lazarus
The new article Lazarus (Parable) is ready. But I am not able to make the disambig to (Lazarus).
Could you please do it?
--Joaquín Martínez 16:21, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
::There's only one way to tell... [[Jack Thompson|*Creates Article*]].--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:07, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
Thank you!
--Joaquín Martínez 16:54, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
Good luck
with that paper. --Hojimachongtalk 23:58, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
vandals
Here's my question - some people are creating articles that have offensive titles, but benign content. In these situations, I can delete the content, but the offensive title still exists on a site. I know the Sysops can delete these entirely, but is there anything I can do to erase that material? All I know to do is alert Sysops of the problem, but if nobody is available to delete it immediately, the articles can sit on the site and look bad for the site. Any ideas? --Thammersmith 13:27, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
Please vote for me
Please vote for me here: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Request_for_Bureaucratship Conservative 20:10, 22 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::::Let's play with this guy - he deserves it. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 19:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
Eagle...
I was too slack to make Eagle (it doesn't help if one is not a US citizen)... but does that make me a Scout for Life? Human 02:39, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
Question
Question for you on the Conservapedia_talk:Request_for_Bureaucratship page. Jrssr5 14:35, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
Nevermind ... saw your reason. Jrssr5 14:37, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
Grandpa!
Nananana Batman!
14:43, 24 April 2007 DanH (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Cherry-picking" (too much speculation)
Thanks, MountainDew. --Ed Poor 14:45, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
Quick catch there of "Andrew Nissian"! Thanks!--Aschlafly 01:54, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
Hey Dan
I just wanted to ask why the Ted Stevens got reverted out of the "internet" article. The series of tubes statement is getting passed around a lot and I think people need to know where it came from.1
New Age
What was wrong with my edits to New Age that they had to be reverted? I didn't use the {stub} template on that one. DrSandstone 13:38, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
Budapest
I understood.--Kádár Tamás 19:12, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
Beaver ?
"Jeremiah, after seeing your edits to Biscuit and Beaver, I don't know why I haven't blocked you yet."
I really don't know what you're talking about here; my Beaver article is entirely factual.
Lots of animals are classified as fish by the Catholic Church for Lenten dietary purposes; I thought that was an interesting beaver-related fact. I will get you a citation for it... Here [1]
Had I wished to create a properly satirical article about Beavers it would surely have been rather different, just run the implications of the word through your mind...
(My biscuit article was entirely factual too, that sort of thing really does go on - again I can get you a reference if you like.) If you considered the material to be irrelevent or inappropriate, you were free to remove it. Defining it as vandalism (and blocking me for it) was a most unfair and disproportionate reaction in my opinion.
You've blocked me unjustly once, and now you're persecuting me about the content of a completely authentic article. Please stop doing this. --Jeremiah4-22 20:27, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:Hello again,
Just wondering
What could I do to gain your trust? Flippin 15:31, 26 April 2007 (EDT) Well, I can't say I agree with your assessment of the "edit war" at Fargo. The source was eventually added, btw, so I think I was right. Flippin 09:34, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
NAMBLA
I certainly don't advocate for NAMBLA or the inclusion of the link, but for the sake of knowledge, NAMBLA has never explicitly supported man-boy love; they promote the legalization of such activity. Sick perverts... --Hojimachongtalk 17:37, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
Mammon
I need an expert. I found this article, and it was a hostile rant, but not without some truth. I changed it to create a structure, but I don't know enough about the topic to feel comfortable adding a lot of content. Could you or someone else with knowledge help out?--JoyousOne 20:36, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
User:JeffersonDarcy
I endorse the block on JeffersonDarcy; I was going to do it myslelf and with a 12 hour block using Edit Warring as a Guideline. He can't say he wasn't warned, [2] and I want to make a record I support it. RobS 14:06, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
I screwed up, as a guideline this reads 3 hours to one week after the warning. RobS 14:10, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
Vandal
No problem. Thanks for blocking him. Murray 15:45, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
Any idea on how to tag this guy, Dan? I blocked some of his IP's I found via Traceroute, but he's still coming back. --Hojimachongtalk 17:48, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
This guy really needs to get a life. My annoyance with him is negated by my laughs over his pathetic hobby. --Hojimachongtalk 14:15, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
No joke. Doesn't he have anything better to do on a Sunday? DanH 14:15, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
Polap Srewdna
he didn't edit, why the block?
You can talk to me directly
Mate, I an't hiding anything feel free to ask me anything, anytime. Tmtoulouse 18:16, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
Take another look at my contributions the past few days since the reversal of my block. Take a look at what icewdg has contributed to the site in the last few days. Then ask whether a post by icewdg with a vague cryptic remark on my wikipedia talk page tips the scales relative to my contributions to put me under investigation. If you are curious about why I post that message on various talk pages, feel free to ask me directly. Tmtoulouse 18:21, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
I want to put a few more pictures in the [[evolution]] article. Do you know how to do that? I want to put a picture of [[Ernst Haeckel]] in this section: http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Evolutionary_theory_and_Cases_of_Fraud.2C_Hoaxes_and_Speculation.E2.80.8E I also want to put a picture of [[Stephen Gould]] in this section: http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Theory_of_Punctuated_Equilibrium Please don't use the picture of Stephen Gould used at [[Wikipedia]]. Can you help? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:13, 18 July 2007 (EDT)conservative
No harm, no foul. I am only pressing this point because I am a member of this community, there is WAY to much of this SYSOPS vs. Editors war floating around. Lets work towards breaking down that wall. We are both humanbeings, whatever usergroup we are in shouldn't force use to talk past or around each other.
As to why I post that message, take a look at the users I post it too. They are not vandals, they are not people that are bad. They are people that have a political, scientific, and cultural view much like my own. They also share a common interest in wiki editing and have decided to try conservapedia out. Much like myself. This is a group of people with a lot in common. We like to talk to each other about a range of things. Its off-topic to CP and doesn't belong here. So when I see someone that I think would be interested in our group I invite them to contact me and we talk about it. Nothing nefarious there. Tmtoulouse 18:26, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
Toulouse would've told me if there was a conspiracy. I feel left out of there is one that he's hiding from me.-AmesGyo! 20:04, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
I was too quick to judge and I apologize again for it. DanH 20:05, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
Page Delete Request
Could you please delete a page for me. I'm an idiot and was working while watching tv. I accidentally mistyped the page I wanted as "Deviance Behaviour" instead of "Deviant Behaviour". I can't figure out how to undo it, so it must mean I can't. Thanks --TrueGrit 00:01, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
Bohdan
I see you're still having trouble with Icewdg. His post on Bohdan's userpage looks like they're working together. Do you think a block of Bohdan is necessary? Reaganomist 14:18, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
i have no involvment with himBohdan
Simpsons are really liberal
Homer punched out George Bush and called president Bush Commander Kookoobananas. Not to mention that he supported Republican parodys Mr. Burns as governor and sideshow Bob. Somebody should show how liberal they really are!!!
--[[User:Dark1Kristen|Dark1Kristen]] 22:04, 22 July 2007 (EDT)
I think the Simpsons speaks for itself. If one can't pick up on the undertones by themselves, then they are an idiot.--Elamdri 17:08, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
Leftists strike again. Are you going to accuse me of being "inbred" and living in a "trailer" for your next act?--ILikeCookies 17:12, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
I wasn't making fun of you. I just think that going around telling people the Simpsons carries a liberal message is a redundant act. Most people who watch the Simpsons already know that it carries said message, and if they don't they're either burying their heads in the sand, or they really are just ignorant.--Elamdri 17:14, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
The Simpsons are satire, especially early seasons. They make fun of everybody. DanH 17:22, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
Vandal attacks
Conservative must resign as a sysop before there is any chance of the vandal attacks ending. Davros 15:34, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
I think we have evidence icewdg is a sock of an active contributor; let me pull up the suspect list Conservapedia:Request for Bureaucratship#Oppose 5. RobS 15:43, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
Let me get this straight: Expressing one's opinion in a democratic manner is grounds for suspicion? --AKjeldsen 19:40, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
I tell ya, what makes me suspicious is when a brand new user "knows their way around" CP, and almost instantly has a handful of UXBs set up. They should all be clumsy newbies, like I was! Human 20:08, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
C'mon - you're still a newbie, Human. I mean, you haven't even been threatened with the 90/10 rule yet, have you? --AKjeldsen 20:12, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
Hahaha, well, actually, that's probably the one rule they could never bust me on. Have you checked my alleged contribs lately? The only thing I've been accused of is relying on myth-filled, distorted YEC science texts. Oh, and I was mean to someone who used very poor grammar once, but Ed (I think) deleted it and I fixed it and sorried for it. What does make me a n00b, I guess, is not knowing what all this fuss over evolution is about? Human 20:22, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
I don't think anyone knows what it's about. GodlessLiberal 20:25, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
Here is something I put on the main page regarding getting more web traffic to Conservapedia
Getting Web Traffic to Conservapedia - Article Creation/Improvement Drive Conservative 21:29, 29 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
Page deletions
Thanks for the recent deletions of unwanted British articles, they seem to be spreading a vast web of lies over us, ill try and keep my eye out for them. Jennisuk 13:34, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
--[[User:Dark1Kristen|Dark1Kristen]] 22:06, 22 July 2007 (EDT)
what on earth is "unwanted" and who decides? I note that faggot has been deleted; http://www.bbc.co.uk/food/recipes/database/faggotswithoniongrav_3899.shtml is the first google hit for "faggots" (through google.co.uk). These things are easily verifiable without even consulting wikipedia. --Olly 15:02, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Likewise the article on Chip Shops, the Ham Shank and Tommy Toley, all much loved British cultural treasures. Is it true that 90% of Americans have no passport and are not interested in anything outside the US of A? Tommy Toley 15:06, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Yes, just like 78.9% of all statistics are made up on the spot.--Elamdri 15:13, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Surely 77.4% is the approved Conservative figure. That 78.9% number looks very LIBERAL to me. GUARDS!!!!!! Tommy Toley 15:15, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
earlier you twice deleated the page faggot. can you delete it again, or is it now allowed?Bohdan
Faggot
Whay on earth are you protecting Faggot? This is the kind of filth I protest at and you are protecting it? What kind of sysop are you? DrSnoddy 18:30, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
It would appear that you have deleted and protected an article on Northern English cuisine. I fail to see how this could be controversial. Is this a case of Anglophobia or racsism? An Encyclopedia should cover all knowledge (that's what the word means). Perhaps you could expand your reasons for this. MontyZuma 18:43, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Further (non-Conservopedia) research has led me to conclude that what we in the UK consider the main meanings of the word faggot are unfortunately almost completely unknown in the United States of America, where the word has merely the most unsavoury connotations (as I learned earlier this evening from the now deleted article). It is unfortunate but a fact that some words have been denuded of their wholesome content and effecively rendered unfit for polite usage. Faggot appears to be one such word, though I will continue to munch on and indeed cook with faggots as long as I breathe British air.
Such staple words of the English language should not be tainted in such a way. It was bad enough finding out that "gay" means something other than happy and that the tadger is no longer purely descriptive of the pocket billiards cue. Queen Elizabeth herself should issue a proclamation and prevent the noble langue d'Anglaise from further bowdlerising. William H Bhuna 18:42, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
William, I agree in principle, yet amcoming to recognize increasingly that Conservapedia is very much an American undertaking. I expect 'bowdlerise' also means something frightful in Colonial parlance.DDWatkinsIII 18:46, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Quite possibly, they are that far from the Queen's presence that surely all those hamburgers and MTV have tainted their minds. And DanH, I consider it rude for you to block me as I was merely correcting an unfortunate spelling of the town of Thirsk - home of a fine church and a finer brewery dating back over 300 years. When you have some history dating back farther than that, feel free to excersise your "right" to block me. Until then, make sure you salute the Queen before every meal and pray to the TRUE flag, the Union Jack. we exiled you rabble once and you raped the langue D'Anglais, you no longer support your true queen and you heathens never even invented cricket. Call that civilised? William H Bhuna II 18:57, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
and
I am the only person who has any business editing them (aside from Andy). Other users who edit them are probably vandalizing them. Niandra protected them, but then TK unprotected them (he was probably confused since this is a technical issue.) Could you either take it up with other sysops or just go ahead and protect the above templates? Thanks. {{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 12:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
Did I miss something? What unsavoury connotation could be construed from a faggot when it is a savoury dish - i.e. not sweet. Perhaps some ignorance has interfered with the Queen's or indeed King's English as faggots go back many hundreds of years. Any way please enlighten me on how it is unacceptable.MontyZuma 18:51, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Strange as it may seem, Mr. Zuma (and it is a pleasure to communicate with you), the word faggot, though in the English language it calls to mind nothing more unwholesome than a meaty mouthful of beef, dripping with copious quantities of gravy, or a short firm stick of the burning kind, in the American demotic appears to refer to the unspeakable sect of Bulgars and their Carthigensian praxii. I hope my meaning is clear. DDWatkinsIII 19:01, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
I take your point, I had forgotten about the Bashi-bazouks. I can understand some discomfort regarding the negative connotations of faggot adopted in the erstwhile colonies but surely the page could have been protected intactum before any untoward vandalism occurred. In this way inquiring minds would have been directed down a wholesome path of truth rather than S & G deviance. I am well reminded of Matthew 7:3-5
And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye,
but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the
mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye;
and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.Deviance is in the eye of the beholder. Let the innocent come forth and speak the truth without fear. MontyZuma 18:59, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Question
can you delete User:Sisterhix and the talk page? You blocked this user yesterday(blocked "Sisterhix (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (racism)) and the comments on the page are offensive to Jews(specifically the use of "kike").Bohdan
From Conservapedian
Thanks for the welcome.--Conservapedian 01:34, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Image Protection
Why are you protecting all the images? ColinRtalk 02:23, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Andy ordered that we do, Colin. Because users are going in and substituting what is there for porn. I believe we chatted about that last night, no? If we didn't, please forgive me for not mentioning it, I should have. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 02:52, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
IP Trace and Madison
Alternatively, he could have gone to any one of the open computer labs. Each department likely has a lab or two, along with each dormitory, each library, and each wireless hot spot. Each one of these has a distinct set of IP addresses. Ultimately, to block it will probably be necessary to block access to all three class B networks that are owned by the UW Madison. With possible 65,534 addresses per network, there is quite a bit of room for distinct IP addresses. --Mtur 15:20, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
There were only two distinct IP addresses for these users, whereas the other vandal we've had from the same university only had one IP address, which makes me think that they were different people. My theory is that the other one just operated out of his dorm room or something. It's possible, though. DanH 15:22, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
images
Hi Dan, could you please fix the image in New Mexico for me? I can't seem to get the hang of situating images in the pages here yet, I'm still learning "wiki" formatting. I added some info to the page, but now I can't get the photo that was already there to look right - could you please help? It's much appreciated, thanks! --Taj 15:58, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
Vladimir Putin
In response to your question in an edit summary ("does anybody know how to fix it so that this source doesn't show up twice in the references list?"), this is how you do it.
Thanks
Your rewording of Hinderburg clarified it very well. Thank you.MoshiachNow 17:12, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
commandments broken
Sources should be revealed. True and veriable. Conservative 17:39, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
good work
reverting/blocking. tried to help a little Flippin 13:35, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Leo Tolstoy
Both are great writers.
--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 18:03, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Reverts
If you have difficulties with some of my edits Dan, I would appreciate some kind of feedback as to why that is the case. I am always willing to learn, but silence isn't a good teacher. Thank you Learn together 04:40, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
We usually ask such questions on the discussion page for the article involved, Learn Together. Since Dan has to be up in 5 hours for classes, let me help you some. The material about the Clinton's rarely seeing each other smacks of gossip, and I would have deleted that. The part about his not running for a third term is likewise redundant, and not relevant, as he never once considered it, in fact since the Constitutional Amendment was passed some sixty-five years ago, no President has considered it, because the Constitution forbids it. Those are just off the top of my head. Please don't take editing personally, as that is the nature of wiki's in general. If you need more questions asked, just let me know! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 04:56, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
Thank you. I could see getting to sleep could be important. ;-) My main concern is in understanding what to expect. Based upon what I have observed, I'm assuming it is customary to have a sysop check all entries as they occur and determine if he believes the edits are appropriate? If that's the case, then that's fine, it's your house and your rules. I'm here as a guest, albeit, one who is hopefully answering your call to expand and improve articles. It was a string of reverts without comment that I felt needed clarification. Any extra understanding you could give me if I am in the ballpark would be appreciated. Learn together 11:39, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
Monetzuma deletion
DanH, I have had a few discussions with Mr. Schlafly over user MontyZuma whom he thinks you blocked. All I am asking is if you apologized did you unblock him? Mr. S says it is up to you. Ian St John 18:28, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
I wonder if someone creating another account, to skirt a block, and proclaiming their innocence is akin to someone on trial claiming, as they always do in most cases, they too are innocent? Hindsight is indeed a wonderful thing, but one most of us are not blessed with, eh? You know who blocks each and every user, because the list is available for all to see. What it is that drives people to be unrelenting in making an example of someone who is only doing their best, simply because they are perceived as having "authority"? --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 20:10, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
Not sure what your'e getting at TK but thanks for pointing me towards the who-blocked-who list, I didn't know about it before. I can see that it was Aschlafly who implemented the block not DanH. A bit odd that he denied it. Anyway I have been diverted too much by this as I was only looking for a quote I had seen and got intrigued.Ian St John 01:37, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
You should be chatting with Auld Nick, he often doesn't understand either. I believe DanH gave him a short block, and Andy later extended it. Always read down a bit more after you find the name you are looking for. ;-) --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 01:48, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
Thanks for your positive comments
Regarding Conservapedia:Sysop_contest/Nominations/HeartOfGold, I Just wanted to thank you for your positive comments. HeartOfGold 03:08, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
Blocked yet again
Why was I blocked for, and I quote, "Radiohead"? Yes, I am a Radiohead fan but I hardly see how this is grounds for blocking me. InAnInterstellarBurstIAmBackToSaveTheUniverse 18:16, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
You seem to be picking violent lyrics. i.e. we hope you choke. All of these lines suggest ill will against the site. Plus, the site owner expressed concern about them. DanH 18:17, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
It's not my fault that Thom Yorke has such a negative outlook on life. BringDownTheGovernmentTheyDontTheyDontSpeakForUs 13:24, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
You gotta help me, Dan. They keep blocking me! Geo.plrd said my name was too long (and that I was inciting civil unrest or something). DontGetSentimentalItAlwaysEndsUpDrivel 15:22, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
Maybe you should just sign up with a shorter name. DanH 15:23, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
SharonS said I should choose a reasonable name if I'm not a vandal. If I vandalize a few pages would I be allowed to keep this name? IWillStopIWillStopAtNothing 15:41, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
No. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 16:19, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
Blocking of Ian St John
Dan, Thanks for your apology. I know it was an honest mistake. Don't feel too bad about it. Ian St John 18:45, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
Hangarian dinosaurs
Whay did you delete the bit I wrote about stegosaurus in hungary? my Grandma and grandpa are both from there and they are the ones that told me and some of their freinds say it is true. - CliveN
Thanks for removing the polygamy smear. I was considering removing it, but as a Mormon myself I always get nervous that I'd be accused of trying to cover up the history of my church or something silly like that. I was just about to post on the talk page asking for the opinion of others when I saw your edit; far more efficient. :-) [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 18:39, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
Thanks
Thanks for the kind words on my edits! I promise I'll always try to do my best and hopefully I can keep earning your respect. ;-)
Also, any chance that the satan article could be opened again? I'd like to add information/make alterations. For instance I think the line about Aliens from another planet being a source of supernatural power should probably go. ;-) Thanks Learn together 15:41, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
Retrieved from "http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:DanHarchive1"
ViewsUser page Discussion View source History Watch Personal toolsWilbur My talk My preferences My watchlist My contributions Log out master control
Main Page
Index
Debate topics
Recent changes
All pages
Random page
Help
Help Index
Desk
Statistics
Conservapedia Commandments
American Government
Home
Lectures
Homework
Search
edit console
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Printable version
Permanent link
This page was last modified 21:56, 19 May 2007. This page has been accessed 67 times. Privacy policy About Conservapedia Disclaimers