67
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 277:
Line 277: + + + + + + + + + +
a few questions...
I've seen too many articles here that suffer from lack of info; it was like someone created an article, threw in a single sentence, pronouced it good, then left. I don't like working like that! There will be additional info and pics added before the week is out to make it look better. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 21:39, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
I've seen too many articles here that suffer from lack of info; it was like someone created an article, threw in a single sentence, pronouced it good, then left. I don't like working like that! There will be additional info and pics added before the week is out to make it look better. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 21:39, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
== a few questions... ==
:a) First, Conservapedia has a policy of original material only, no copying (except short, properly attributed quotations, of course).
::and where may I have found this "policy"? its not on [[The Conservapedia Commandments]] page...
:b) Second, the GFDL license does not allow re-use of GFDL material unless you follow the GFDL rules. Conservapedia itself does not license its material under the GFDL, so re-using it here breaks one of the most important GFDL rules.
::so if conservapedia does not use the GFDL (which I should have realized, my apologies), and there is not a link to the license in use in the lower-left corner like most mediawiki-based sites have, what license is the content of conservapedia under?
– [[User:frijole|Fʀɪ<small>ɺ</small>øʟɛ]] <sub>( [[User_talk:Frijole|тɐʟк]] • [[Special:Contributions/Frijole|¢<small>ʘ</small>и†ʀ¡<small>β</small>s]] )</sub> 12:54, 13 March 2007 (EDT)