308
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + + + +
Talk:Essay:25 Worst Court Decisions (view source)
Revision as of 15:03, October 25, 2007
, 15:03, October 25, 2007Epperson v. Arkansas
Shouldn't there be some sort of specified criteria as to what makes a case more bad than any other? Additionally, shouldn't the facts be combined with the legal questions presented to educate the children viewing this site as to what would exactly make a court decision worse than any other? This seems like nothing more than a cheap, political attack at an unfavorable opinion, not a legally erroneous one. --[[User:TGlennRet|TGlennRet]] 01:36, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
Shouldn't there be some sort of specified criteria as to what makes a case more bad than any other? Additionally, shouldn't the facts be combined with the legal questions presented to educate the children viewing this site as to what would exactly make a court decision worse than any other? This seems like nothing more than a cheap, political attack at an unfavorable opinion, not a legally erroneous one. --[[User:TGlennRet|TGlennRet]] 01:36, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
== Epperson v. Arkansas ==
The decision in that case was not "evolution ''has'' to be taught", it was that you could not legally ban evolution from being taught in a public school setting. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> 11:03, 25 October 2007 (EDT)