4,604
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + + + +
The Supreme Court Lecture Two (view source)
Revision as of 09:03, October 26, 2007
, 09:03, October 26, 2007no edit summary
Lecture 2: Judges Censor Acknowledgement of God
'''The Supreme Court'''
'''Second Lecture - Judges Censor Acknowledgment of [[God]]'''
'''Instructor: Andy Schlafly'''
Has atheism become the default religion protected by the [[Establishment Clause]]? The [[Ninth Circuit]] asked this question in its dissent when the court refused to hear ''[[en banc]]'' the infamous Pledge of Allegiance case brought by Michael Newdow in 2003 (''[[Newdow v. U.S. Congress]]''). Is the Court right? Has judicial hostility towards anything religious voided our state constitutions, our monuments, and our history?
Has atheism become the default religion protected by the [[Establishment Clause]]? The [[Ninth Circuit]] asked this question in its dissent when the court refused to hear ''[[en banc]]'' the infamous Pledge of Allegiance case brought by Michael Newdow in 2003 (''[[Newdow v. U.S. Congress]]''). Is the Court right? Has judicial hostility towards anything religious voided our state constitutions, our monuments, and our history?