nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − Remove the lock on this page so we can edit it. [[User:Televangelist|Televangelist]] 13:36, 26 October 2007 (EDT) −
Talk:Christopher Hitchens (view source)
Revision as of 20:10, October 26, 2007
, 20:10, October 26, 2007Reverted edits by Televangelist (Talk); changed back to last version by Jaques
Is there any reason why Hitchens is described as "conservative"? <small>previous unsigned comment added by [[User:The Four Deuces |The Four Deuces]]</small>
Is there any reason why Hitchens is described as "conservative"? <small>previous unsigned comment added by [[User:The Four Deuces |The Four Deuces]]</small>
:Variously the article has described him as "conservative", "neo-conservative" and not at all. Hitchens is very much a paradox, and I for one wouldn't like to try to pin down exactly which part of the political spectrum he fits into. Several areas at once, probably. I'm not convinced that conservative or neo-conservative are accurate. Perhaps we should discuss here exactly who thinks he's what and why [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 09:09, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
:Variously the article has described him as "conservative", "neo-conservative" and not at all. Hitchens is very much a paradox, and I for one wouldn't like to try to pin down exactly which part of the political spectrum he fits into. Several areas at once, probably. I'm not convinced that conservative or neo-conservative are accurate. Perhaps we should discuss here exactly who thinks he's what and why [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 09:09, 20 June 2007 (EDT)