Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools (view source)
Revision as of 01:02, October 28, 2007
, 01:02, October 28, 2007New page: In ''Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools'', 503 U.S. 60, 72 (1992), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Section 1003 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1986, 100 Stat. 1845, 4...
In ''Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools'', 503 U.S. 60, 72 (1992), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that Section 1003 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1986, 100 Stat. 1845, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d-7, "cannot be read except as a validation of [[Cannon v. University of Chicago|''Cannon'']]'s holding." Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] concurred with the judgment and this assessment, ''see also id.'' at 78.
The Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1986 expressly abrogated States' sovereign immunity against suits brought in federal court to enforce Title VI and provided that in a suit against a State "remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available . . . to the same extent as such remedies are available . . . in the suit against any public or private entity other than a State," § 2000d-7(a)(2).
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
The Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1986 expressly abrogated States' sovereign immunity against suits brought in federal court to enforce Title VI and provided that in a suit against a State "remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available . . . to the same extent as such remedies are available . . . in the suit against any public or private entity other than a State," § 2000d-7(a)(2).
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]