Sorry. I didn't know that. I'll restore them right away. --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 00:58, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Sorry. I didn't know that. I'll restore them right away. --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 00:58, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
+
:Thanks David. There are almost three hundred articles in the series. I don't see the necessity to bring them all over at once. However, some of the major articles, like [[Whittaker Chambers]] for example, just contrast that one with the current Wikipedia entry to get some idea of whats happening.
+
+
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whittaker_Chambers
+
+
:Look at the work that was put into it so they could (1) refer to his mentally ill-grandmother; (2) use the word "dysfunctional" twice; (3) add "an enemy of the Republic, a blasphemer of Christ, a disbeliever in God, with no respect for matrimony or motherhood."[11] (4) ...a psychiatrist who characterized Chambers as a "psychopathic personality" and "a pathological liar."[12]
+
+
:WP:ATTFAQ refers to "obsolete and deprecated" sources. Venona evidence makes all this obsolete and deprecated. Nonetheless, in absense of any verifiable citations to discredit Chamber's testimony against Hiss, Wikipedia editors still resort to Hiss's obsolete and deprecated slanders cause they simply will not give up on a losing cause. Now you know why Conservapedia was founded. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:30, 13 March 2007 (EDT)