16
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: +
no edit summary
I'm sorry, I shouldn't have jumped right in. Do you see what I'm saying, though? If you look at the page that I created for category:Liberal Slander, I think I make a good argument. Do you think I should more clearly develop what I'm trying to say?-[[User:Darius|Darius]] 13:46, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
I'm sorry, I shouldn't have jumped right in. Do you see what I'm saying, though? If you look at the page that I created for category:Liberal Slander, I think I make a good argument. Do you think I should more clearly develop what I'm trying to say?-[[User:Darius|Darius]] 13:46, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
:You need to take a look at what slander means. You say on [[Talk:Pastafarianism]] that you think it is satire -- satire is not slander; slander is a very serious charge. (And as a technical matter, "slander" is for spoken word, and "libel" is for written word.) [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:04, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
:You need to take a look at what slander means. You say on [[Talk:Pastafarianism]] that you think it is satire -- satire is not slander; slander is a very serious charge. (And as a technical matter, "slander" is for spoken word, and "libel" is for written word.) [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:04, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
Thank you for correcting me, HJ. Sorry if I went a little overboard: nothing wrong with zealous advocacy, though, right :-) ? I had just gathered from articles like [[liberal deceit]] and [[liberal hysteria]] that I could be free and call a spade a spade... but I agree, there should be boundaries, so I'll be more careful. As for slander/libel, I was aware of the distinction, and my choice to use "slander" was (1) to circumvent alliteration ("liberal libel" sounds too cutesy) and (2) to invoke Coulter's book. Could you help me think of some people who might fall under "liberal slander"?