Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:  
:Here's a site that might be useful for cites. [http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=main&page=affirmations] :[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 22:29, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:Here's a site that might be useful for cites. [http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=main&page=affirmations] :[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 22:29, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::Even with these, we need to be careful to maintain that this organization does not represent ALL secular humanists. Also, I think the "anti-religion" assertion really needs some major support, as it's hard to define anti-religion (against all belief in supernatural? personally disbelieving but willing to accept others' beliefs? actively proselytizing against religion? believing that religion should be illegal?), and I think of secular humanists as being the segment of nontheism that emphasizes religion or lack thereof the least, aiming more towards social justice and such things. --[[User:John|John]] 22:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::Even with these, we need to be careful to maintain that this organization does not represent ALL secular humanists. Also, I think the "anti-religion" assertion really needs some major support, as it's hard to define anti-religion (against all belief in supernatural? personally disbelieving but willing to accept others' beliefs? actively proselytizing against religion? believing that religion should be illegal?), and I think of secular humanists as being the segment of nontheism that emphasizes religion or lack thereof the least, aiming more towards social justice and such things. --[[User:John|John]] 22:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
====Why the rv of 17:24, 13 March 2007 ====
 +
I didn't see how that edit was ''wrong''? [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 17:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
412

edits

Navigation menu