18
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 138:
Line 138: + +
→snarl
*Missing your point here, I have to admit. I have dozens of liberal friends and acquaintances who employ the use of the term "junk science" every day, so quite obviously the writer of that article practiced [[deceit]]. I believe that term was used by one of the lead scientists on the United Nations global warming committee, in the Wall Street Journal, to explain the extrapolated conclusions that the UN used in its published report. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 11:22, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
*Missing your point here, I have to admit. I have dozens of liberal friends and acquaintances who employ the use of the term "junk science" every day, so quite obviously the writer of that article practiced [[deceit]]. I believe that term was used by one of the lead scientists on the United Nations global warming committee, in the Wall Street Journal, to explain the extrapolated conclusions that the UN used in its published report. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 11:22, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
:: I'm sorry, I was trying to point out that the definition of "homophobia" was a little bit unfair to gay activists. Moreover, it is not really informative; the term is (more?) often used to describe "fear of being/becoming gay" than fear of actual gays. I'll look it up in a dictionary and write a better definition. --[[User:Eygar|Eygar]] 13:26, 3 November 2007 (EDT)