Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,670
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
one less "most wanted" page
Richard Sternberg is a scholar who holds two PhDs in the area of evolutionary biology.<ref>Dr. Sternberg holds one PhD in molecular (DNA) evolution and the other in systems theory and theoretical biology.</ref> He has also published more than 30 articles in peer-reviewed scientific publications and books.
Dr. Sternberg became the victim of retaliation by [[evolutionists]] after he allowed the publication as managing editor of an article by an advocate of [[Intelligent Design]] in a scientific publication.<ref>The article was by Dr. Stephen C. Meyer, entitled "The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories."</ref> Despite the fact that Dr. Sternberg followed all the standard peer review procedures for publication in the journal, the "Proceedings of the Biological Society."<ref>http://www.rsternberg.net</ref> Three qualified scientists, all of whom are evolutionary and molecular biologists teaching at well-known institutions, approved the paper. The journal never formally withdrew or retracted it, despite intense pressure by [[evolutionists]] to do so.<ref>http://www.biolsocwash.org/id_statement.html</ref>
== References ==
<references/>
Dr. Sternberg became the victim of retaliation by [[evolutionists]] after he allowed the publication as managing editor of an article by an advocate of [[Intelligent Design]] in a scientific publication.<ref>The article was by Dr. Stephen C. Meyer, entitled "The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories."</ref> Despite the fact that Dr. Sternberg followed all the standard peer review procedures for publication in the journal, the "Proceedings of the Biological Society."<ref>http://www.rsternberg.net</ref> Three qualified scientists, all of whom are evolutionary and molecular biologists teaching at well-known institutions, approved the paper. The journal never formally withdrew or retracted it, despite intense pressure by [[evolutionists]] to do so.<ref>http://www.biolsocwash.org/id_statement.html</ref>
== References ==
<references/>