Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:     
As per the Manual of Style, the content of this article should be about [[intelligent design]] while the current content should move (for example) to <nowiki>[[Intelligent Design (book)]]</nowiki> - any sysop opinion on this? If the answer is no, then the article should at least have a line like "''This article is about the book called Intelligent Design. For the concept, see...''" at the top. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 15:59, 22 September 2007 (EDT)
 
As per the Manual of Style, the content of this article should be about [[intelligent design]] while the current content should move (for example) to <nowiki>[[Intelligent Design (book)]]</nowiki> - any sysop opinion on this? If the answer is no, then the article should at least have a line like "''This article is about the book called Intelligent Design. For the concept, see...''" at the top. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 15:59, 22 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
:I can't see anything in the [[Conservapedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] about his, but I would otherwise agree with you.  If there are no objections I will move/rename this in a couple of day's time (if I don't forget).  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:02, 5 November 2007 (EST)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu