5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: +
Debate:Two sides to a coin. The liberals use of Swift Boat (view source)
Revision as of 07:33, November 7, 2007
, 07:33, November 7, 2007no edit summary
:Oh so Teresita, there is no truth behind swift boating, definetely the liberal version.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 10:10, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
:Oh so Teresita, there is no truth behind swift boating, definetely the liberal version.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 10:10, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
Perhaps there should be an official "Swift Boat" page. I came to conservapedia to try to get the other side of the coin. Certainly it's used as a pejorative, but when used in discussion, it's a term to which there are definitely two sides. I really don't know much about the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, but when I do searches for it, all I see is for the most part the wikipedia side of the story, (for example http://swiftvets.eriposte.com/kerrypurpleheart1.htm) with claims such as only one member of the swift boat veterans for truth served on the boat with him, and he was not present for those circumstances where Kerry earned his medals. A definitive page here on Conservapedia would help to show the other side of this debate. For the casual searcher, it seems as though there is only one substantive side to the story, there is no response on the swift boat web site to many inconsistencies raised, and perhaps the truth could come out here.
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]