Changes

The edits to the first section are simply unacceptable from an accurate and factual point of view.  If the first quote should be kept, then it should be placed in the section "Misinformation about reparative therapy" which first of all is entirely biased simply by the language.

The edits to the first section are simply unacceptable from an accurate and factual point of view.  If the first quote should be kept, then it should be placed in the section "Misinformation about reparative therapy" which first of all is entirely biased simply by the language.

Would someone PLEASE revert these edits, they're entirely unacceptable.(except the changing to the reflist template.)

Would someone PLEASE revert these edits, they're entirely unacceptable.(except the changing to the reflist template.) --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 16:33, 7 November 2007 (EST)