Changes

:Ok, I get 31 hits in the first two volumes, and none after. This covers about 1500 pages. The img is from the last hit, and probably is a summary of findings (this is an unverifiaed statement).  What this finding is, is the basic history outlined which is reported in most other documents.  Here, however, we have even the original primary sources reported.  This from the [[SACB]] Final Report published in 1966.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:12, 9 November 2007 (EST)

:Ok, I get 31 hits in the first two volumes, and none after. This covers about 1500 pages. The img is from the last hit, and probably is a summary of findings (this is an unverifiaed statement).  What this finding is, is the basic history outlined which is reported in most other documents.  Here, however, we have even the original primary sources reported.  This from the [[SACB]] Final Report published in 1966.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:12, 9 November 2007 (EST)

:Preliminary Summary & interpretation: what this appears to be is a legitimate union that was infiltrated by members of the Communist Political Association, aka CPUSA or whatever. It would be incorrect to label WGA or SWG as a commie front, though its membership & leadership need to be looked at.  Truthfully, I'm not that familiar with this stuff or the sources, and I have certainly avoided much of the other wrtitten accounts simply because they are suspect.  On a personal level, my interestis in the diplomatic field, and this domestic stuff, while I've always heard the rumours, certainly would not take any of the apologists views at face value under any circumstances.   

:Preliminary Summary & interpretation: what this appears to be is a legitimate union that was infiltrated by members of the Communist Political Association, aka CPUSA or whatever. It would be incorrect to label WGA or SWG as a commie front, though its membership & leadership need to be looked at.  Truthfully, I'm not that familiar with this stuff or the sources, and I have certainly avoided much of the other wrtitten accounts simply because they are suspect.  On a personal level, my interest is in the diplomatic field, and this domestic stuff, while I've always heard the rumours, certainly would not take any of the apologists views at face value under any circumstances.   

:But anyway, we have a starting point.  And some good, solid source material to work from.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:33, 9 November 2007 (EST)

:But anyway, we have a starting point.  And some good, solid source material to work from.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:33, 9 November 2007 (EST)

[[Image:00000727.tifl.gif]]

[[Image:00000727.tifl.gif]]