Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Conservapedia:Abuse (view source)

Revision as of 01:25, March 14, 2007

18,127 bytes added ,  01:25, March 14, 2007
restoring page
Line 1: Line 1:  +
<center><big>''Justice never sleeps''</big></center>
    +
 +
This is where you can report abuse of editing privileges. Please make notes short and concise. Crossed out notes have been dealt with.
 +
=Current Alerts=
 +
 +
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
===Liebniz===
 +
I am asking that Leibniz be warned, if not temporarily banned, for repeatedly interjecting argumentative opinion into articles.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 17:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
===Creationism===
 +
 +
[[Creationism]]
 +
 +
Evolutionist JoshuaZ has arbitrarily erased the correct definition of Creationism two times now.
 +
 +
Issue #1:
 +
 +
I think it is logical and plain common sense that an evolutionist should have no say in defining his scientific rival because said rendering is bound to be riddled with bias and error.
 +
 +
Issue #2:
 +
 +
At any rate, I ask that my rendering of Creationism be reviewed by Administration to be the correct rendering and that JoshuaZ be informed of the ruling if in my favor.
 +
 +
''Proposed Rendering''
 +
 +
"Creationism is the belief that physical reality plainly reflects the work of invisible Divine power (Romans 1:20) and original causation of matter and life was by supernatural agency (Genesis 1:1; chapters 1 and 2). Universally, Creationism is the belief that a Creator is responsible for producing reality (general revelation) and that this revelation is the primary way of deducing the existence of said Deity. Based on observation, Creationism asserts scientific evidence is better explained when a Creator is presupposed to have created reality."
 +
 +
 +
[[User:Ray Martinez|Ray Martinez]] 14:21, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
----
 +
==Finished==
 +
I'm trying to upload a photo of a nokia mobile phone, and the server is abusing me. [[User:Ilove69|Ilove69]] 06:45, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
it says Could not copy file "/tmp/phpydXiTn" to "/home/conserv8/public_html/images/b/bd/Nokia.jpg". [[User:Ilove69|Ilove69]] 06:47, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:We are having minor problems. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 16:00, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
[[User:CWilson]]; [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Divorce&diff=prev&oldid=31472 looks like an obvious parody] to me. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 13:14, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
*I'm not sure what you mean when you keep accusing people of "parody."  Is parody quoting parts of the Bible you disagree with?  Show me where they misrepresent truth found within the Bible when you make accusations please.  [[User:Meekrok|Meekrok]]  13:22, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:This is actually in the bible, but should be reworded. No Block. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 15:51, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
::Re "parody," see note below.<ref>"Parody" as used by Tsumetai means mocking conservatives by exaggerating real conservative views for comic effect. To take a less subtle example, at one point the Hillary Clinton article said "An appellate court reversed this ruling... She had the appellate court executed and drank the blood of the judges." Conservatives may believe many bad things about Clinton but not that. In my opinion, this ''is'' a parody, and the last sentence gives it away. But of course there's never any way to be sure. ~~~~</ref>
 +
 +
[[User:JC]] and [[User:Madonna]] should also be banned for their inappropriate names. No one should be permitted to call themselves by a holy name, and that should also include names that are blatantly imitating or abbreviating holy names. --[[User:Jlovesu|Jlovesu]] 13:05, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
[[User:JC]] looks suspicious; [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Earth&diff=31690&oldid=31686 this edit] seems a bit off to me. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 12:21, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
[[User:Tsumetai]] invites people return to hell. [[User:JC|JC]] 12:32, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
*No, not really. It's a screenshot. He was apparently amused when, due to the way MediaWiki works, Conservapedia seemed to be inviting ''him'' to return to Hell. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 12:37, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:JC is the user's initials ,Madonna is good contributor. No Block. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 15:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
[[User:Meekrok]] - pi = 3? Flat Earther? Parody account. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 12:25, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
*No-- I'm not a parody, this is outrageous and offensive.  Nothing I've said is against conservative views nor the Bible.  [[User:Meekrok|Meekrok]] 12:27, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
 +
[[User:Christianist]], vandalism pure and simple. Replacing articles with short sentences like "you can't call it vandalism if it's instantly revertable." [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 10:06, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
[[User:AschIafly]] impersonating our own Aschlafly; note that the first 'l' is actually a capital 'i'. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 09:43, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Blocked [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 15:55, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
[[User:Madonna]] Vandalism of "Satan" article --[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 12:08, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
* No-- I didn't vandalize the Satan article. I added the link to "Satanism" and somebody else (I don't remember who) made some prank edits right around the same time. --[[User:Madonna|Madonna]] 12:24, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::My apologies, Madonna. Admin, disregard my first report.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 12:36, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
[[User:Rjohnson]] Vandalism of multiple pages --[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 12:10, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
: Agreed, he recently vandalized one of my recently created pages. --[[User:Meekrok|Meekrok]] 9:59, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
::Blocked [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 15:55, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
[[User:Zedek|Zedek]] for [[Crucifix]] and [[Premarital sex]].
 +
 +
 +
[[User:Bonki]], created [[Mormonism]] with the prank content "Mormonism began in the late 1980s as a response to the New Romantic movement." (Article is now a redirect to [[Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]]). Has a mix of valid edits (to [[John Milton]]) and strange edits. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 20:37, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
[[User:Wikilover]] for vandalism of [[Ronald Reagan]] page
 +
:All three blocked. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 00:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
[[User:Richard]] for the unfunny, satirical [[Warren G. Harding]] page.
 +
:Entry is good. No Block [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 00:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
[[User:Tsumetai]] for persistent vandalism of pages e.g. [[Wolfbagging]] with no justification.
 +
:Not blockable, clean up [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 13:40, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
[[User:BaggerOfWolves]] and [[User:Smurge]] for [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wolfbagging&oldid=28700 this page]. The page should be deleted, too. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 12:02, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Thanks.  I cleaned up that stuff and blocked BaggerOfWolves for a month.  I did not see sufficient basis for blocking Smurge--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:14, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Correction.  I just blocked Smurge for a month for participating in that silly Wolfbagging entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:18, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
[[User:Luke-Jr]]. Doesn't believe in Vatican II and is rewriting Catholic-related items to call the current Pope a heretic. Perhaps a warning first? He seems to be doing it out of belief, not for the sake of vandalism.
 +
 +
: Just warned him.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:18, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
[[User:Weregerbil]]. Unhelpful edits. Try jawboning? At [[Conservapedia_Talk#Fellow_Conservapedians|Conservapedia Talk]] he asks Conservapedians to vandalize the user page of a Wikipedian whose Wikipedia account name is also Weregerbil. His [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Reality&diff=next&oldid=26221 third edit] here is the prank edit Steven Colbert asked his listeners to make at Wikipedia (though here it's just replacing another prank). [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:09, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Blocked for infinite duration. Thanks for the astute observation, Dpbsmith.  By the way, obscenity in one edit gave him away.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:19, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
User [[User:BillyBoy]]; - blatant vandalism --[[User:AustinM|AustinM]] 08:40, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Agreed - Some of it is subtle, so it will take some work to revert.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:15, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: Several of his edits were inappropriate, and he's been blocked for a month.  I don't think he falls into the category of vandalism, however.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:17, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
All four of these have been blocked, and their edits reverted.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:09, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
User [[User:Badnewswade]]; pick an [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Badnewswade example]. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 08:24, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
User [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Designee Designee] - blatant vandalism. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 07:38, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
User [[User:UncleO'Sama|UncleO'Sama]] is currently vandalizing the site--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 07:32, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
User [[User:Foxnewsforlife|Foxnewsforlife]] has been vandalizing pages.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 02:38, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:All four above have been blocked, and their edits reverted.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:09, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
Two users (Boogerman and Repubssuck) seemed to go crazy this morning and vandalize more than 20 articles. Both should be blocked.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 08:28, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
: Agreed. [[Christianity]] was [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=25117&oldid=24957 vandalized] with an insult about Christians being all gay. I removed that untrue statement. --[[User:Orion Blastar|Orion Blastar]] 08:35, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Both have been blocked. ~ [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 11:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
User:ChooChoo is a blatant troll; see for example his article on [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Shellfish&diff=prev&oldid=26044 Shellfish]. User:Christ seems [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category:Things_condemned_by_God&diff=prev&oldid=26062 extremely suspicious] too. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 16:01, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
::Christ is blocked. ChooChoo will be watched [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 21:51, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
He might just be a very hardcore Fundamentalist, you know--the bit about shellfish _IS_ in Leviticus. --[[User:Sandbagger|Sandbagger]] 16:15, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Add User:Intelligent to the list of [http://www.conservapedia.com/Fallatio trolls who can't spell]. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 16:13, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:No, add him to the list of trolls that are blocked. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 21:53, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
[[User:Sandbagger]] is vandalizing [[global warming]] with untrue and insulting statements. I am trying to revert or change them to more factual ones. --[[User:Orion Blastar|Orion Blastar]] 20:03, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Sandbagger cited his edits, therefore it is not vandalism. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 21:53, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:: Actually he edited text and added insulting text in lines that used my citations, but his words were not part of the sources cited. For example "since the [[Evil Liberal Science Conspiracy]] will only provide grants for pro-Global Warming research" and that was not part of the citation someone else added, or "rather than some boring, obscure climatologist with no experience at public speaking who we can ignore conveniently" that had no citation source and was added to one of my entires. Even "Furthermore, Gore exhaled molecules of [[Carbon Dioxide]] while lecturing on tour, proving that he is a hypocrite who can be ignored without loss." was not cited either. The text was intended to insult and make the article less accurate. --[[User:Orion Blastar|Orion Blastar]] 22:36, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:::Blocked, your assistance is appreciated. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 22:54, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
</s>
 +
 +
<s>User:Cocks - inappropriate name, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Plesiosaur&diff=28314&oldid=28311 inappropriate edits]</s>.
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
: And yet it is necessary and proper that "evolutionists" - a true [[neologism]] - have a say in the biased rendition of scientific topics.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 18:18, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Ray Martinez ==
 +
 +
I take issue with your telling a user that he is not allowed to edit just because he is not a conservative. As long as people follow the Conservapedia Commandments, they ought to be allowed to post. There is no rule that states that we must be conservative. In fact, I can think of at least one sysop who isn't a conservative. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:43, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: I think it is plain common sense that non-conservatives be  disallowed to edit pages for factual content. How do you expect the conservative view of truth to be reflected if this rule is not in place?
 +
 +
:[[User:Ray Martinez|Ray Martinez]] 20:00, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
That's the spirit.  ''ein Reich, ein Volk, ein Viewpoint!'' --[[User:BobA|BobA]] 20:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
By that logic Ray, you shouldn't be allowed to edit the pages for evolution, atheism, theistic evolution, Darwin, etc.--[[User:Murray|Murray]] 19:00, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:This is not Wikipedia. How do you expect the pages on Evolution to have accurate information if Wikipedia-evolutionists write the page? Do Creationists get to write ANY page of this subject matter at Wikipedia?
 +
 +
:I am asking Administration to implement plain logic and common sense: only conservatives edit pages that are controversial because otherwise the Wikipedia  pro-atheist view gets duplicated over here. If Administration rejects this logic and axiomatic truth then I am gone from here and do not want my name associated with a nonsensical reason for being  (= conservative intent negated by allowing non-conservative participation).
 +
 +
:I suspect Administration is a little too flat headed and does not really stand for conservative viewpoint of facts across the board. They are more concerned with  pseudo-objectivity than implementing their vision. You probably have nothing to worry about, atheist.
 +
 +
:[[User:Ray Martinez|Ray Martinez]] 19:59, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Yeah, they kind of do. [[User:Linus M.|Geekman314]]<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup> 13:54, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::You're just plain wrong, Ray.  You're right that I disagree with you about evolution, etc. (presumably that's what you meant when you referred to me as "atheist.").  And yet a couple of days ago you thanked me for "quality clean-up of the Darwin page" which doesn't seem to fit with your assumption that only conservatives can edit controversial pages to your satisfaction.--[[User:Murray|Murray]] 21:17, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
If you continue this generally incivil and confrontational tone, you'll find yourself blocked quite quickly. And controversial things (ideally ''everything'') on Conservapedia needs to be sourced. But the commandments demand a source (Commandment 1). --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 20:03, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Does your opinion have anything to do with the fact that you agree with my opponents? You have intentionally mischaracterized my views and revealed yourself emotionally attached. I suggest that you do not issue a veiled threat of censorship against me when you cannot refute. And nobody argued against having a source; you have set up a straw man.
 +
 +
:[[User:Ray Martinez|Ray Martinez]] 20:11, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
1) Please explain how I revealed myself "emotionally attached" anywhere in that comment.
 +
2) ''You'' are the one attempting to censor opposing views; as long as people abide by the commandments (and warnings issued by sysops), they are free to edit. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 20:13, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:By accusing me of something untrue: ''"If you continue this generally incivil and confrontational tone"'' which indicates rage - that's why you do it. And I am attempting to influence Administration to actually implement their vision of relaying the facts. This can only be achieved by disallowing non-conservatives from editing controversial pages. You guys can edit pages about France, bubble-gum, Britney Spears, dolphins etc.etc. but not about Creationism, Evolution, abortion, Constitution etc.etc. for obvious reasons. If you want your view heard then edit at Wikipedia. I am asking Administration; that's the way change is effected; request and argument. If they deny then I have lost.
 +
 +
:[[User:Ray Martinez|Ray Martinez]] 20:36, 12 March 2007 (EDT)\
 +
 +
Because obviously ''no'' good at all can come from the opposing viewpoint<nowiki></sarcasm></nowiki>. If they add their opinion, it will be easier for the conservative editors to find 50 sources to disprove the liberal arguments. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 20:42, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Cannibal corpse ==
 +
Is the [[Cannibal corpse]] page appropriate for Conservapedia? [[User:CEinhorn|CEinhorn]] 00:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:well what is cannibal corpse. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 00:54, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
::Apologies.  I mis-capitalized it. [[User:CEinhorn|CEinhorn]] 01:16, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:It had enough profanity on it that I just deleted it. In any event, a Satanic metal band (who hasn't been in the news or notable for anything else) has no place on Conservapedia. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:16, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==User:Libertarian==
 +
[[User:Libertarian]] has been blocked, but an admin ''really'' needs to check the edits and delete a few from history, not just the current version of the article, and delete the uploaded image, too! --[[User:Scott|Scott]] 10:33, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
User:Crimesofthelemon is a vandal. Edits have been RV but needs ban.
 +
:Blocked and cleaned. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 16:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
==Notes==
 +
<references/>
 +
[[User:Itsjustme]] is a liberal vandal.
MountainDew
2,358

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/33165"

Navigation menu