216
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 68:
Line 68: +
Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally? (view source)
Revision as of 21:38, November 12, 2007
, 21:38, November 12, 2007→Flawed First Premise: I beg your pardon.
:::::Why do you consider the talking snake account to be allegorical? Do you have a reason, or is it just "intuition"?
:::::Why do you consider the talking snake account to be allegorical? Do you have a reason, or is it just "intuition"?
:::::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:49, 12 November 2007 (EST)
:::::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:49, 12 November 2007 (EST)
::::::If you're seriously contending that snakes are physically and mentally capable of verbal communication, I don't think we can really continue this conversation. [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 16:38, 12 November 2007 (EST)
== But What is really important here? ==
== But What is really important here? ==